User talk:Mponz1

December 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sharon Osbourne. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
I'm sorry your edits were taken the wrong way. However, "critisized" is not the correct way to spell it, so you probably should just let it stay at "criticized."

Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

What I initially read was "criticised" and I knew it was wrong. Later I knew "critisized" was wrong as well as "criticised" (I put critisized to fix criticised); but I should have spell checked it. Then I did spell check it and knew "criticized" is the right way, but I didn't go back to fix it - yet. At least you saw that it was wrong and so I'll assume that you corrected it. If you didn't then I'll go and check it in case. - Mponz1
 * Oh, oops, I guess I mistyped. (It was never "criticized"--it was "criticised," like you said.) But since Sharon Osbourne is British, the article is written in British English, so criticised (the British spelling) is best in that article. There is a Wikipedia policy on this: WP:ENGVAR. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Oh so in British english "criticised" is the norm. OK, that explains it, and thanks for teaching me that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.75.84 (talk) 20:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC) signed