User talk:Mprakes19/sandbox

You have some great information to add! I appreciate how well the content is arranged and believe it will greatly contribute to the existing article. Looking through the existing references, there were a few that could stand to be updated as their links were no longer available or led to a non-existent page. I would encourage further research on the scientist with multiple additional resources so that the information can be adequately backed up. A picture would be nice as well, and I think more information about her early life will really build the article! Geboenke18 (talk) 02:42, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

I just published my peer review of your article! I think you have made some good process. I agree with Gretchen that a picture or two would be great! Link to Peer Review Alfuller18 (talk) 15:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

This is looking wonderful so far. I really appreciate your use of the scientist's name. As I was reading the existing article, I noticed that the author didn't use the scientist's name very much. Obviously, that isn't a requirement, but I do appreciate that you're doing it because it makes the article more personal. I third the idea that a picture would look great! You're doing really well! Elizabeth Combs —Preceding undated comment added 01:29, 2 March 2020 (UTC)