User talk:Mqphd

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Mqphd. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Lattice Boltzmann methods, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 17:33, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Lattice Boltzmann methods. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 02:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 11:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 20:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lattice Boltzmann methods. MrOllie (talk) 02:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

After this block expires, I suggest you start using the article talk page to propose your changes; see also WP:PRIMARY and WP:COI
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Mqphd (talk) 00:03, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Mqphd (talk) 14:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)


 * You're going to need to communicate with other editors; posting the same thing you posted on the article page is not communication. You have yet to acknowledge WP:COI and WP:PRIMARY issues with the material you are posting. If after your block expires you simply reposted that paragraph to the article again without engaging with other editors, you will be blocked indefinitely. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 18:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Mqphd (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 35073
has been closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 20:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)