User talk:Mr.Fantastique

Feel free to post comments below. --Mr.Fantastique (talk) 06:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

In regards to your edit summary here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ravenswing&diff=next&oldid=209029009, you are incorrect. As per WP:USERPAGE, A user can delete comments from his own talk page at any time. It is not vandalism. If he doesn't want your comments on his page, please do not edit war to try and reinstate them. Thanks! Redrocket (talk) 06:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The erroneous accusations never stop with you. Twice vandalism, now edit warring ?  You are not as familiar with Wikipedia policy as you put on.  --Mr.Fantastique (talk) 06:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * You seem to be far more familiar with me than I am with you. I was just informing you that what you were calling vandalism is not, and is perfectly acceptable under wikipedia policy. If you wish to delete this warning, you can, that's also your right. And thanks for the slight, but I am quite familiar with wikipedia policy, that's why I was trying to help you out. Redrocket (talk) 07:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

So far your Wikipedia tenure has been marked by incivility. You've demonstrated far more willingness to indulge in namecalling and picking fights than in learning Wikipedia policy, guidelines and practices. Certainly you becoming a productive editor (I recommend starting with the links at WP:FIVE and working from there) is the preferable outcome, and we'd regret having to take sterner action against you.  Ravenswing  13:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * "We"... yeah, you really own the place. Considering your talk page, you are not such a popular editor on Wikipedia.  This makes your advice just about useless to me.  --Mr.Fantastique (talk) 08:06, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * By "we", he probably means wikipedia editors in general since you've received multiple warnings. He was trying to tell you that you can calm down and understand what these warnigns mean, or you can continue on this path and wind up having your contributions reverted because they don't fit, or worse still, being blocked. You can choose to ignore good faith advice and warnings if you wish, of course, but it's a lot easier to just make an effort to be civil and get along with everybody, don't you think? Redrocket (talk) 08:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Two editors ≠ general representation of Wikipedia.  Actually, Traynor is the only editor to "warn" me and it turned out to be untrue.  But as much as I appreciate your false dichotomy, I really don't see what an argument with one particularly obsessive and unpopular editor has to do with the quality of my edits or the reversion thereof.  --Mr.Fantastique (talk) 11:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)