User talk:Mr.Grave

Hello, Mr.Grave, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to List of Naruto antagonists has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. jj137 (  talk )  01:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Kujibiki Unbalance
Please be careful not to confuse Kujibiki Unbalance the OVA and Kujibiki Unbalance (2006 series)... they are distinctly different. The 2006 series is a re-set of the story, with a new plot and different character traits. David Bailey (talk) 14:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

New Cutie Honey character descriptions
Thank you for your help with the character summaries. I have very little time to edit the list myself, so I'm glad you've added facts I've left out. --an odd name 19:03, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I edited the last character summaries you added, and removed the "incomplete list" line because I think the characters list is complete. I don't think the "villains of the week" should be added, as they only make a big impact in their own episodes (the only major one I can think of is "Saline" the singing capsule girl, and even she's killed in the same episode she appears).

I also don't know why you added Yankee as a link for Daiko's part. I checked the wiki and other places, and I removed the link because I see no relation to all-girl gangs. (See also the style guidelines in WP:EGG and WP:CONTEXT, but if you think you can do better, don't worry about them, or even what I think.) --an odd name 04:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Kuroshitsuji
About your edits to the Kuroshitsuji character section, I don't want Grell, Madam Red, and Elizabeth under that heading because they are non-recurring. As explained on the talk page, I would like only recurring characters. Any others will appear on the tentative character list. I am currently working on that, but your help would be appreciated. However, I'll leave the current revision stand as is. ~ Itzjustdrama C  ? 02:05, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk Pages
I notice that you haven't made an edit to any talk pages. At the top of the page next to the "article" tab, there is another tab labeled "discussion". Every article has one. There you can discuss the page and any recent edits or future improvements. It also allows you communicate with your fellow editors. Guidelines can be found on this page. Don't forget to sign your posts! Regards, ~ Itzjustdrama C  ? 01:31, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

List of Kuroshitsuji characters
As I have stated I would, I have changed the headings on the page as I outlined on the talk page on the thirteenth (UTC), today, if there was no comment before then. I'd like to alert you to this action and I'd like to state that if you have any comments, dissent, questions, and so forth, please direct them to the linked section on the talk page above or to my own user talk page. Thank you. ~ Itzjustdrama C  ? 04:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Mr.Grave, due to the fact we are having no communication about our disagreement regarding the headings on the article, I have alerted the WikiProject the article falls under, WikiProject Anime and manga about the disagreement under the follwing linked section: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. I sincerely hope you voice your reasons for why you would like to set the page up, as you will not do so anywhere else. Regards, ~ Itzjustdrama C  ? 21:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC).

I am completely willing to accept that my way is less efficient, but only after you tell me your reasoning for your way as I cannot see how yours is more beneficial to an audience's understanding of the cast. ~ Itzjustdrama C  ? 21:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Mr.Grave, you are highly encouraged to participate in the discussion at Talk:List of Kuroshitsuji characters about the organization of the list of characters if you wish to promote a different format. However, continuing to revert the page's new organization without participating in the discussion will be viewed as editing in bad faith. In fact, looking through your edit history, you have never once discussed anything on a talk page. --Farix (Talk) 15:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 22:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 07:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ''Again, do not continue edit warring like this. Try DISCUSSING for a change on the article talk page.'' -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 08:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ''Due to your complete lack of communication and continued reverting of edits without comment nor discussion, you are now considered to be edit warring. If you continued, you will be reported for possible blocking.'' -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 06:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. ''Once again, do not try to modify the structure of this list without consensus nor continue trying to fill it with excessive details. See WP:WAF.'' -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 14:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Marugoto Anjyu Gakuen
I have nominated Marugoto Anjyu Gakuen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Marugoto Anjyu Gakuen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Farix (Talk) 19:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. ''Once again you are edit warring without discussion, and adding unsourced, minute details to a character list. You've been warned about this repeatedly, as well as about not using edit summaries. Please cease.'' -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 18:49, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''DO not start this again. You have been warned repeatedly about your refusal to discuss anything, your constant additions of original research, and your inappropriate changing articles to bad formats. Just stop it.'' -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Orange Yane no Chiisana Ie
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Orange Yane no Chiisana Ie, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mangafox.com/manga/orange_yane_no_chiisana_ie. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Edits
I am not following you. You just happen to be editing some articles which are on my watchlist. Specifically, Kiss×sis, Toradora! and List of Kanon characters to my immediate knowledge. I am merely editing the articles to remove anything unnecessary, such as excessive plot summary in character bios, or outward bias towards an adaptation, which tend to happen a lot in anime/manga articles.--  十  八  02:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs  23:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. --DAJF (talk) 23:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Eaglestorm (talk) 05:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome (Little House with the Orange Roof)
I translate the series so I can help update if needed. I'd rather update with what's been scanlated rather than what I know already.

MLL of TUHC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drvtech (talk • contribs) 22:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:LittleHousewithanOrangeRoof2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:LittleHousewithanOrangeRoof2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet]  [talk]  22:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:AkumatoLoveSong.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:AkumatoLoveSong.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet]  [talk]  22:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:LittleHousewithanOrangeRoof.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:LittleHousewithanOrangeRoof.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet]  [talk]  22:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Alan16 (talk) 08:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Shorts (film)
Please take care to make higher quality edits, and please make sure to ues proper grammar when editing an article. While we do appreciate edits from any and every user, the quality of the encyclopedia is important. If you need help on writing skills, please feel free to give me or any other regular user a request. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:52, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Little House with an Orange Roof


The article Little House with an Orange Roof has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Hardly anything other than a plot summary. No third party sourcing or assertion of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Durova 319 04:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Ralph Austin
Please fix this part of the "change 123 article. The grammar is terrible and make no sense.

Articles for deletion nomination of Little House with an Orange Roof
I have nominated Little House with an Orange Roof, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Little House with an Orange Roof. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ɳ OCTURNE ɳ OIR talk //  contribs 19:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Crotchety Old Man (talk) 15:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Doctor Girlfriend
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Doctor Girlfriend. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. DP 76764 (Talk) 01:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to List of Chibi Vampire characters. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 18:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Leverage: wrong kind of bold
I reverted your bolding of character names in Leverage (TV series) since it violates MOS:BOLD, and not WP:BOLD as I inadvertent noted in the edit summary. —EncMstr (talk) 21:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Breaker (manhwa)


The article The Breaker (manhwa) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no third party sourcing to indicate WP:N has been met

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Active Banana    (bananaphone  23:29, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of tomboys in fiction, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 18:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)