User talk:Mr.He

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Requests for mediation/Falun Gong, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. --Fire Star 火星 14:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Arbcom
Informal mediator Wiki  e Zach|  talk  is preparing to move the Falun Gong mediation case to the Arbcom. I have been asked to alert concerned (to the best of my knowledge) editors about this matter. Thank you. --Fire Star 火星 22:55, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Falun Gong page
hi, I am sorry that I reverted your edit today. It is not that I disagree with you, but I agree with them that a short summary works better than the quote. thanks --Samuel Luo 23:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

That is fine. --Mr.He 07:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

3RR notice
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. &mdash; Nearly Headless Nick  {L} 09:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

A note from CovenantD
I've removed your personal attack on my motives from my talk page. If you wish to discuss the article, then do so on it's talk page, where your accusations are there for everybody to see. CovenantD 01:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Request for Mediation
This message delivered: 12:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC).

Falun Gong mediation
Hello, I'm sorry it's been awhile, but I recently agreed to mediate that case. I don't know if it's a stale issue, so it would be good if a few of you let me know whether or not mediation is still needed. Since there are so many of you, I'm going to assume that all of you agree to me mediating until and unless I am told otherwise. I'm also going to assume public mediation is fine, unless someone asks for private mediation, or I come to think private mediation might be better. I would, however, appreciate it if you just said something there to let me know if you are still around. Also, assuming you are still interested in mediation, please watchlist the page if you haven't already. Thanks! Armedblowfish (talk|mail) 02:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not a FG practioner and I think that the photo is nuteral.--Sir james paul 01:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposed three-strike rule
Hi Mr. He. It will be great if you can approve / disagree the proposed three-strike rule I've made concerning editors' behavior on the Falun Gong Wiki entry. The rules are on the discussion page. Thanks. Jsw663 17:18, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * But what constitutes as 'legitimate material' in something as controversial as the FG case? My actions are targeted at users who revert or edit without discussing it first, passing it off as obvious vandalism when sometimes it is not always obvious.  This should be compatible with your supposed stance.  You can always say it won't work, but if you don't give it a try because you don't disagree with it, why object to it?  Jsw663 18:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello Samuel Luo
how are you today —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jswkoreanman (talk • contribs) 12:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC).