User talk:Mr.Loverlover123

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Tiësto has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 15:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alankc (talk) 15:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ødsted in Denmark
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ødsted in Denmark, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no sources, no relevant information, no links to articles, no links from articles, user warned twice for vandalism of other articles

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Alankc (talk) 15:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Tiësto. —SpaceFlight89 15:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of of Ødsted in Denmark
A tag has been placed on Ødsted in Denmark, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

poorly written, nothing relevant, no sources, no relevant information, no links to articles, no links from articles, user warned twice for vandalism of other articles

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Alankc (talk) 15:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)