User talk:Mr.Matt.p

September 2012
Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alessandro Del Piero, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GiantSnowman 11:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Evasive Action (1998 film)
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Evasive Action (1998 film), may be copied from http://flickfacts.com/movie/12371/Evasive%20Action. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 23:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Your addition to Evasive Action (1998 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:00, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luis Suárez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chelsea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Football League Two, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=557107959 your edit] to Goal United may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Speedy deletion nomination of Goal United


A tag has been placed on Goal United requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Woodroar (talk) 02:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Notability
Hi, Mr.Matt.p, I wanted to respond to your comments at Talk:Goal United. We have notability requirements for articles, both general and specific for web content, requiring that articles be based on multiple reliable, independent published sources. If you feel that such sources exist, you can certainly work on an article in your user space or through our formal Articles for Creation process until the article is ready to be moved to "main space", meaning the encyclopedia itself. As for Online Football Manager, it is immune to our speedy deletion process because it makes claims about its importance, albeit claims that aren't backed up by reliable sources. I'll take a closer look and see if it meets our requirements. If you have any questions, feel free to let me know. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 03:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

All the information was coming from the website itself and was to be backed up by print screens of the relevant pages on the site. Matt Price 11:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * To be perfectly frank, that won't cut it. We're not here to report what you or I have discovered or think is true, we're here to report what's notable and verifiable in reliable, independent published sources. Something warrants an article only if it has been the subject of those sources. (In short, the fact that something exists doesn't mean it qualifies for inclusion in the encyclopedia.) In the case of a game, that means coverage by legitimate game journalists, reviews by high-profile game magazines or websites, and so on. You may want to check out WikiProject Video games/Sources for more information about the sources we're looking for. Again, if you have any questions, let me know. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 13:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of criminologists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stanley Cohen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Evasive Action (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evasive Action (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Evasive Action (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Film Creator (talk) 10:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)