User talk:Mr. Accessory

Cocoabo
I've added the "prod" template to the article Cocoabo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Cocoabo. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.

Formalities aside, I notice you're a fairly new editor. Welcome to Wikipedia; I hope that you can find a way to enjoy the content of the website and improve articles as you see fit. However, I have to take issue with the page you've created, Cocoabo, which is a familiar within Kingdom of Loathing. I'm an avid KoL player myself, and KoL is well-known enough to have its own article here, but by no means do any of its familiars or items need separate pages to be explained. That's what resources like KoL Coldfront and our own KoL Wiki are for: detailed explanation that doesn't interest the general audience of Wikipedia. Imagine if there were separate Wikipedia pages for every familiar, item, monster, location, etc. in KoL, and that the same thing would be done for other MMORPGs like World of Warcraft, FFXI, Ragnarok Online, Guild Wars, and all the other popular online games. A compendium of that much game-related information would be bloated and unmanageable; that's why it is better for other sites to get more detailed. I hope you understand and keep editing Wikipedia constructively. Thanks. --Crazysunshine 00:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Wierdddd.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wierdddd.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)