User talk:Mr. Carbunkle

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see
 * Wikipedia's policies on vandalism
 * Policies on banned or discouraged content

If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!  NA SC AR Fan 24 (radio me!) 21:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * It's okay to do anything with your account except vandalise, be a sockpuppet, or otherwise disrupt Wikipedia. Updating WP:BANNED, for instance, is fine.  N F 24 (radio me!Editor review) 12:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Self-blocking
I think I need the do the same sometimes. Although it is against policy, this is a handy little tool called the wikibreak enforcer (which will simply log you off if you log in with it). Try that and I hope not to see you editing! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:08, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, I wouldn't dare block you, especially after you've gone and buttered up Jimbo. How am I going to compete with that? =) -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Although I do have to add that this is probably one of the funniest things I've ever seen. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, Rouge admin is a part of Category:Wikipedia humor (which I hope clears it up). Honestly, I wouldn't know (or have I just been sworn to secrecy?).  There is still the Rouge-o-meter although I tend to deal more with the fun of The Wrong Version. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:25, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

WP:ROUGE
What, in god's name, does that mean? Mr. Carbunkle 00:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Where have you found that evil stuff ;) Was it here? --  FayssalF  -  Wiki me up®  00:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

The Rouge song

 * We're evil and we're arrogant
 * And vicious and conniving and like to rant
 * Which is why the folks 'round here call us ROUGE


 * We're part of the supeer-yur race
 * Don't concurr, we'll slap you in your face
 * We don't like no as the answer
 * I know best, 'cause I'm administrator


 * And if you want to give the truth
 * That's fine by me. Oh yeah,
 * But if it can't be sourced at all


 * I-DONT-CARE-IF-IT'S-TRUE
 * It's gone


 * We like policy
 * S'long as it follows common sense
 * We know we're the best
 * Our RfA will tell you all the rest


 * And if there is an article
 * That everyone wants kept
 * But it's not notable or sourced at all


 * WHAT'S-THIS-WORD-WE-CALL
 * Concensus?


 * We're not the rogues they say we are
 * We just use common sense
 * And if you don'like our viewpoint


 * BUDDY-THAT'S-TOO-BAD
 * Cause I'm rouge

Mr. Carbunkle 01:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice one mate. I really like it. Enjoy. -- FayssalF  -  Wiki me up®  01:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Whenever I think of rouge admins, for some reason, your name's the first to come to mind. Mr. Carbunkle 01:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. Is it horrible? Do you want me to know about your reason? -- FayssalF  -  Wiki me up®  01:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmm? What are you saying? I like rouge admins. The encyclopedia is made better with them going around, deleting stuff against consensus because it violates policy and ignoring every rule that conflicts with their opinions. I aspire to be one someday, if I become a sysop. Mr. Carbunkle 03:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * My reason is that I saw your name, looked at the categories, and saw rouge admin and wanted to see what it is. Mr. Carbunkle 03:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * so now you found out about "what it is" and would like to delete stuff against consensus because it violates policy and ignoring every rule that conflicts with your opinions? -- FayssalF  -  Wiki me up®  03:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * You DO know it's only a humorous joke, right? I'd never ignore consensus or go against policy for those things.
 * ... or do I? Mr. Carbunkle 03:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't tell Mr. Carbunkle since i don't know you. Maybe after a couple of months and some contributions i'd have a clear idea. -- FayssalF  -  Wiki me up®  03:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Indefinite block
Per WP:SOCK and WP:DUCK. Durova Charge! 14:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Excuse the use of profanity, but what the fuck took you so long?! No new editor shows up on Wikipedia, edits User:I am eclipsed's userpage first thing with a


 * tag, has contributed heavily to WP:BANNED and WP:MISS right from the get-go, and has a full understanding of policy and immediate knowledge of rouge admins. Good god, you people! Proabivouac was right, you people are so easily fooled.
 * ...though apparantly not stupid. Mr. Carbunkle 21:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)