User talk:Mr. Chess Man

Copyright violations
Read about copyright violations: Copying text from other sources. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 18:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Threefold repetition; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Carroll v. United States (1957) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Carroll v. United States (1957), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 19:27, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Mr. Chess Man

Thank you for creating Carroll v. United States (1957).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Mr. Chess Man

Thank you for creating Simpson v. United States (1978).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kenosha unrest shooting, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 19:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Nightenbelle. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kenosha unrest shooting seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nightenbelle (talk) 19:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification
FDW777 (talk) 19:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If you attempt to restore obviously contentious POV and BLP-violating material to Kenosha unrest shooting without explicit talk page consensus, your account will be blocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring to restore clearly disputed and contentious material to Kenosha unrest shooting. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)