User talk:Mr. Kruzkin

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Onorem♠Dil 03:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't revert your edit to the Anderson Cooper article as vandalism. I reverted it as unsourced. While some reports have said that he is gay, it doesn't appear to be something that he's chosen to confirm. --Onorem♠Dil 04:04, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Rick Santorum. Thanks. monkeynoze (talk) 04:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bob Casey, Jr.. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 04:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Loonymonkey (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Katie Couric edit
My edit to Katie Couric was cited and factual. Just because you like Katie Couric does not change her long standing liberal bias one bit. An overwhelming majority of Americans believe that Katie Couric is liberal, and the MRC has the facts to back it up. Mr. Kruzkin (talk) 22:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * For you information, I watch Brian Williams, not Katie Couric. Secondly, you have no creditability whatsoever.  Going through your history list, I see that you have not done an edit before the 28th of July.  However from the way you edit, it's clear that you're not a first time user of Wikipedia.  Which basically means that you had another screen name prior to this one that had been blocked because of your controversial, disruptive, augmentative and vandalizing edits.  This screen name you have right here, which you probably made on the 28th, is nothing more than a sockpuppet for your ruthless un-neutral ways.  You have been warned many times over in a span of a single day for your disruptive ways.  On top of that, you clearly like to pick a bone with all your oppositions of your so-called “neutral unbiased point of view.”  You really think you can fool anybody with the kinds of stunts that you're pulling on here?  You are nothing more than an obnoxious Wikipedian who makes up worthless nonsense on any major news anchor for your own personal pleasure and satisfaction.  Also judging by the way you strongly praise one senator while brutally bashing another, I am going to venture a guess that you’re a highly out-spoken conservative Republican from Pennsylvania, and you just got a target put on yourself.  Why on earth would anybody take you seriously at what you have to say?  In some ways, I should feel sorry for you.  But it’s obvious you don’t deserve sympathy. KeltieMartinFan (talk) 07:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 18:00, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * My edits to Anderson Cooper were not vandalism. They are completely factual. The picture is confirmed to be his boyfriend, Julio Cesar Recio, and it is cited many times throughout the article that he is gay. I will revert the edits, please erase the warning from my page and do not falsely accuse me again. Thank you. Mr. Kruzkin (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, read through Anderson Cooper carefully. Nowhere does it state that he is gay, though it does mention that "independent news sources have said..."  He, however, has never said it himself.  Per WP:BLP, Wikipedia cannot claim that he is gay.  Please refrain from adding the picture of him and his supposed boyfriend when the picture that is there is fine.  Please refrain from adding false statements to the article, or you will be blocked. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 18:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Block

 * You were blocked for edit-warring, not some secret liberal agenda at work. I am not a liberal, so that excuse doesn't work.  Horologium  (talk) 18:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I am a liberal, but WP:BLP violations don't care what my political persuasion. You added false statements to an article, were reverted, and (rather than discussing) simply edit-warred.  If you would like to discuss changes to an article, please try the article's talk page. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 18:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

I have fully protected this page for 24 hours due to Mr. Kruzkin's reversions of the administrator's review. The unblock request was reviewed and declined, and removing the administrator's comments is not acceptable.  Horologium  (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Al Gore Screaming.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Al Gore Screaming.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Brianga (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:AndersonJulio.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:AndersonJulio.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brianga (talk) 14:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)