User talk:Mr. Kruzkin Returns

Block

 * The original account was blocked temporarily for edit warring; if you've said anything to address that, yet, I've missed it. – Luna Santin  (talk) 21:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Why on earth would anybody want to unblock you so that you can go on with your unproductive disrupted ways? It’s very clear that you are not on here to make productive edits, but rather create a lot of unwanted controversy.  You have repeatedly disobey the rules of Wikipedia, and repeatedly remove any administrative actions put forth by administrators.  On top of that, you are now creating numerous sockpuppets to avoid these blocks, and continue with your disrupted ways.  You can’t fool any of us.  We will block every single screen name and sockpuppet you have until you learn to obey the rules. KeltieMartinFan (talk) 21:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

User:KeltieMartinFan
This user has not been minding their own business. I am requesting that the administrator who unblocks me block them for a good length of time if not indefinitely. They have been relentlessly harassing me over two edits. Please take action. Thank you. Mr. Kruzkin Returns (talk) 21:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Look at how they vandalized my user page for more information. Thank you. Mr. Kruzkin Returns (talk) 21:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * That wasn't vandalism. It was, in fact, perfectly appropriate. The unblock request was reviewed, and refused. Undoing that refusal was borderline vandalism in itself. If you want your edits to articles on Anderson Cooper and Katie Couric, you have two options: find reliable sources or go to Conservapedia. Or you could always start your own wiki. Bart133 (t) (c) 21:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)