User talk:Mr. Nijwmsa Boro


 * Comment: As an administrator, I cannot reverse or modify your block. This is due to the fact that it has been imposed by a checkuser. It appears that, according to your statement above, you created another account after your first account was blocked from editing. This is block evasion, which isn't allowed. I do not know the full extent of the checkuser investigation or the reason behind the block imposed by the checkuser, but I am pretty certain that it is because of this reason - the illegitimate creation and use of multiple accounts. However, since I do not have the full context or extent of evidence as DoRD does, I will place your unblock request on hold so that he may comment.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The CU evidence is unambiguous - please see Sockpuppet investigations/Niezwmxa Boro/Archive. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)