User talk:Mr. Prez/Archive 3

Requests for adminship/Mr. Prez
Hi Mr. Prez. I noticed you created an RfA page about 6 months ago. I was considering deleting it but I wasn't sure of the status of that rfa. Please let me know if you still intend to run for adminship with that rfa - otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete for you in about a week from today. Best,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 22:13, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

Articles for deletion nomination of Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Sea of Monsters
I have nominated Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Sea of Monsters, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Sea of Monsters. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rich(Contribs)/(Talk to me!) I can haz review plz? 12:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fanboy and Chum Chum
Template:Fanboy and Chum Chum has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 05:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Help
I really need help making a practice template right, could you help? Here, have a look User:Mr. Prez/Sandbox. Mr. Prez (talk) 17:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You don't define what "right" is. What do you want the template to look like when you're finished? Xenon54 / talk / 17:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, as you can see, something's wrong, with everything scattered all over the place. Anyway, I just want to know how to make another section without it getting all messed up and how to put info "above". Mr. Prez (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You aren't being specific. What do you want it to look like you're finished? I am not a mind reader and I cannot tell you what's wrong without knowing how the finished product is supposed to look. What do you mean by "making another section" and "put[ting] info 'above'"? Have you read all of Template:Navbox/doc? Are you completely sure that page doesn't answer your question? Xenon54 / talk / 17:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * What I mean by section is a collapsible section in a Navbox with collapsible sections. I'm trying to add a "Beer" section but something has gotten screwed up. And what I mean for info above, is something like the writing at the top of this template. The part that says List of episodes etc. Oh, and I looked at the Template:Navbox/doc page and it's not what I'm looking for.

Mr. Prez (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for being specific this time. I think I have fixed it to your liking. Please read Template:Navbox/doc and Template:Navbox with collapsible groups/doc before you do anything else. (Reading those beforehand probably would have answered both of your questions.) Xenon54 / talk / 18:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. And by the way I didn't know that any of those pages even existed. Mr. Prez (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Wait, what I meant when I asked how to add info in the above space, I meant in the above space of a certain section. Mr. Prez (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you clarify what you mean by "above space of a certain section"? Which section? Do you mean the area defined by,  , or  ? ("X" representing some number)  Intelligent  sium  20:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I meant section 2. Mr. Prez (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Little Chocolatiers
Template:Little Chocolatiers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Sarilox (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Homeward Bound
Template:Homeward Bound has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:12, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to List of iCarly episodes, you will be blocked from editing. Not all episodes pages have to be in only one way Checker Fred (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Help
Helpme Checker Fred claims I have vandalized the List of iCarly episodes article by changing the format of it. Mr. Prez (talk) 18:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of iCarly episodes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Jac 16888 Talk 18:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

It appears as though Checker Fred has disrupted the article once again. He has reverted my reversion. Mr. Prez (talk) 19:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I saw, don't revert him back blindly, discuss the changes with him and attempt to form a consensus. Your edits don't appear to be vandalism so don't worry about that--Jac 16888 Talk 19:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter which version of the article is current; there is no deadline. Stop editing the article, or you will be blocked. Talk to the other user, and try to reach an agreement with them. See WP:DISPUTE.  Chzz  ►  19:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I already did Mr. Prez (talk) 19:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

List of iCarly episodes
Okay the edits you want to make are not use full. The page is fine the way how it is. Not all episode pages have to be a like look at suite life it matches up iCarly but if you look at bob the builder, Arthur, or according to jim they look nothing alike. Here the main reason this way. Okay Here the problem, there were 45 episodes ordered for season two but nick split the season. For example if you look at iQuite iCarly, The production codes are 233-234 that is really two episodes. Also, 25 episodes for season 1, Now this were it gets tricky, about 20 episodes for season 2 if you count the movies  as one episode and about 18 episodes for season 3. If you add that up you will get about 65 episodes for the series. Now They way I am looking at this is that 25 episodes for season 1, 25 episodes for season 2 and 20 episodes for season 3,  wtitch add up to 70 episodes. Now dan mentioned that there were 70 episodes produced by the end of the season. I think he mentioned this on one of his posts on danwarp.com or his twitter ( really don't want to go back and look through)  By the look of things he is counting iGo to Japan as 3 episodes, iDate a bad boy  as 2 episodes (normally going to be (2) seperate episodes, ifight Shelby Marx as  2 episodes, iQuite iCarly as 2 episodes, and iPshoo as two episodes (has not  aired yet). So that adds up to 70 episodes. Sites like tvguide msntv are  counting the the movies as episodes. tv.com is just a mess witch is trying to  get fixed. tvRage is counting the Just the episodes not movies as specials. So  by the end of the third season all of the episodes add uo to 70 episodes for the  series. Now I was thing to do this Have iGot to Japan would be 29/30/31 or just  have one spot Like iGot to Japan 29/30/31. It is less confussing and We are trying to work this out before any remaking is doe. Now If you can find a way to fix this problem.Checker Fred (talk) 19:16, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Look at your talk page. Mr. Prez (talk) 19:19, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Warning: Potentially violating the three-revert rule on List of iCarly episodes.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. - Zhang He (talk) 19:59, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Addicted (TV show)


The article Addicted (TV show) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article looks like speculation of an upcoming TV show per WP:SPECULATION

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Nerdy Science Dude :)  (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 15:39, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bambi
Template:Bambi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 02:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

== Nomination for deletion of Template:The Penguins of Madagascar ==   Template:The Penguins of Madagascar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 04:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Help desk
In your recent edit to Help desk you deleted a question of mine. Could you please be so kind as to re-post my question for me? --רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 06:18, 25 March 2010 (UTC)    :I do recall deleting a question that replaced mine. I think you may have done this?  MR. ' Pre ' Z  20:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ICarly: iQuit iCarly


The article ICarly: iQuit iCarly has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 03:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lakes Region Youth Orchestra
A tag has been placed on Lakes Region Youth Orchestra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 18:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)