User talk:Mr. Samerkov

May 2020
Your recent editing history at Dewan Rakyat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CMD (talk) 08:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Im sorry, Trying not to make Edit War but User Chio Bu is Always trying to Provoke.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 08:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I have also warned that user. Please be aware that WP:3RR is considered to be quite a firm rule, and you should aim to avoid crossing it no matter how much you are provoked. Please consider WP:COOL, and keep in mind that WP:Civility is a core principle of Wikipedia editing. I recommend you discuss further issues on Talk:Dewan Rakyat. Let me know if you have further questions, CMD (talk) 08:49, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Il keep on that mind but User ChioBu still Insist Revent, But Il try my best for the Talk Page.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 08:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

AN/I notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. CMD (talk) 08:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Tofusaurus (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Your recent editing history at Dewan Rakyat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Tofusaurus (talk / contribs) 13:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC) Tofusaurus (talk) 13:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you, im just out from Dewan rakyat. Also, Please Undertstand Between Cybeetroppers. Im just Doing what's Right. Don't Drag me Down ok. Goodbye Mr. Samerkov (talk) 13:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Page Protected
Dewan Rakyat is now protected and now requires an autoconfirmed users to edit the page. The page was protected because I ask for protection in the page. User:Qaidul (talk) 05:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you, I appriciated what you did. These people quickly think how many of MPs change their alliance. Many Thanks to you. Mr. Samerkov (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Pakatan Harapan Reversion
We'll keep reverting edits from him. They just won't accept the fact that WARISAN, UPKO, PSB and Mahathir bloc is no longer with Pakatan Harapan. Qaidul (talk) 04:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Kinda Agree with you, Do I need to change something from Dewan Rakyat for PH ?. I having a problem after they keep spinning around. Il keep on the mind for PH Article.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Kindly support me in this page Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism Qaidul (talk) 09:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Done 👍🏼.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 09:44, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:09, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

HELP !!!!
Qaidul help me please, tell them to unblock me !!!. I have to finnish the ADUN List for Perikatan nasional !!!.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 13:40, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Qaidul Please please !.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 13:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)


 * You should apply for unlock in this topic: Guide to appealing blocks since I don't have a power to do so. Qaidul (talk) 14:24, 24 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Im not trying to ignore but it's hard to use for Unblock this account. Please ask him to unblock me. I have to finnish everything first.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 14:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Just hold on, I'll help you. And also, don't delete your user talk page because it contains some important information for future reference. Qaidul (talk) 14:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks and i just put the Request. And I have to stay away from Politics but Only when someone who party switch. Thanks again Friend.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 14:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

11 PKR MPs have not officially join BERSATU
To prove that the MPs have not officially join BERSATU, please read the information in the link provided:

[11 ex-PKR 'Bersatu MPs' yet to join party] - This was posted on July 14, 2020.

'''"For strategic reasons, in the Dewan (Rakyat), we are labelled as (we are) in Bersatu, but technically, we are not in Bersatu yet.

"We are still looking into the details on how we can (join) Bersatu. At the moment, we are waiting for Bersatu to complete its party elections and annual general assembly.'''

Now this contradicts the statement stating they have joined BERSATU:

[Muhyiddin confirms Azmin has joined Bersatu] - This was posted on 11 March, 2020. This was only a statement by Muhyiddin. There has been no confirmation by the party since then.

Hope that explains this matter more clearly.Lazybugger13A (talk) 06:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Don't explain so big ok. Just small details ok. Saratok and Gombak Officially JOINED not All MPs Defected.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 07:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * *Correction, Not Officially Conform Joined Bersatu.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 07:04, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Mr. Samerkov, that is right. I know English isn't your first language.  So if you don't have any references or new news articles about them joining BERSATU officially, don't change their status in the lists. Also learn how to put in proper references. Lazybugger13A (talk) 15:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Umm I know, But It wasn't me who first Putting their Party the Joined after 29th Febuary 2020. All i know is 2 MPs Which Gombak and Saratok already join signed their join PPBM And i just follow the news only. The other 9 MPs we don't know yet their Status. So it's better me to wait and see other join PPBM. Il try to find some Propper Sources and Reference. By the Way, Thanks for the Heads-up.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 06:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Show me 2 references in which Gombak (Azmin Ali) and Saratok (Ali Biju) have join BERSATU / PPBM. Try to find the sources in which they have OFFICIALLY joined BERSATU. I am patiently waiting for you to find the actually news references.  Lazybugger13A (talk) 15:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


 * I Still Trying to find Most of the Sources but Still I try my best to look after it. Best Regrads.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 05:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


 * [] Hope this will work.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 05:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


 * These are are couple of links that might explain the situation more clearly. There have been many claims by people stating they have joined BERSATU but have not provided any evidence to that effect:
 * [(11 ex-PKR MPs have yet to formally join Bersatu)]
 * [(Report: Azmin and co registering new party, as Bersatu yet to accept them)]
 * [(Bersatu membership still up in air? Azmin says applications still pending due process)]
 * I am waiting for the BERSATU party elections to be over before we get some updates on this. Lazybugger13A (talk) 16:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


 * I Guess we have to wait for the Election GE15.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 03:51, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Also, Im sorry if i misunderstand for Azmin and his Team If they Officially Join PPBM.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 04:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Fender Stratocaster, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. Infobox image changes should be discussed first. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 15:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Should Remind you that We have two picture of Fender Stratocaster. So i have to change one of it.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 01:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

List of active Pakistan Navy ships
Hi ,

please don't engage in edit wars. When you see this happening, please have a look at the dispute resolution policy for advice. Reporting edit wars at the edit warring noticeboard is fine, but joining them is not.

Such edits are usually not vandalism. If someone strongly believes to be right, they are not a vandal. They are trying to improve the encyclopedia, just like you. They just have a different opinion. They may be disruptively editing, but they are not a "vandal".

Thanks and best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

It's fine and Sorry, I don't mean it to engage but that guy really make me crazy. Please do something. I Trying to stop them.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 15:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries. I did do something (Special:Permalink/982981715, Special:Permalink/982981581), but please don't join them in edit warring. A good way to stop an edit war is discussing on the talk page, and reporting those who refuse to discuss. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank You sir.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 15:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Conflicts with ChioBu
Hi ,

Thank you very much for starting a discussion at Talk:Pakatan Harapan.

Regarding ChioBu, I have a feeling there will always be a conflict whenever you meet on Wikipedia. That's sad, but it can happen; some users don't work well together. The easiest way to deal with such a situation, if both users agree, is to avoid meeting each other on Wikipedia.

When necessary, so-called interaction bans can be created by consensus of the community, but in most situations, this is not necessary. Instead, you may like to try voluntarily avoiding interaction with ChioBu. If you see their name in the revision history of an article, you may like to avoid editing it at all. This can be frustrating first, but prevent a lot of stress in the long run.

You are not required to try this; you are welcome to discuss the conflict topic on the article's talk page. However, if there will never be an agreement anyway, I personally recommend disengaging from the conflict.

I have added the same message to ChioBu's talk page.

Thank you very much for considering this, and best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Welcome, i didn't mean to trigger this anyway. I just follow the news only. Nothing much. But i don't always focus on Politics insted i have to check on Military Equipment. Nothing more. But Thanks for the advice.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

 * Talk page access turned off as a) the editor is removing the above notice and b) given the admission below, any unblock request needs to be made at the original account anyway. Nick-D (talk) 07:13, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Nick D
Hey Nick You got me and I don't care anymore. Cause it's all done well. Revent as you want but Don't ever touch Eurohunter, he is not a Sockupppet and not mine acc. You accuse Him as a traitor. So Please, remove him from sockppuppet list.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 02:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)