User talk:Mr. Smart LION/Archive 6

Speedy deletion nomination of Andaz Apna Apna 2
Hello Mr. Smart LION,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Andaz Apna Apna 2 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. CaroleHenson (talk) 10:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andaz Apna Apna 2


The article Andaz Apna Apna 2 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The page is about a film, but there is only cast info and an infobox. There are no citations or information that would lead one to belief it is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaroleHenson (talk) 12:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Sarkar 3
Hi, I'm Devopam. Mr. Smart LION, thanks for creating Sarkar 3!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more content without infringing privacy and copyright. Will be good idea to add a 'See Also' section with other two movies and pertinent articles to make it a relevant trilogy movie article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Devopam (talk) 18:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Burying negative reviews?
Hi there, re: this, I don't get why you pushed the 3.5 star TOI review underneath the 4 star review. This tends to look like we're weighting the good reviews at the top of the section. There's nothing at MOS:FILM to encourage that and it may present a distorted impression of how the film actually performed among reviewers. A week ago there was a 1.5/5 review at the top and it steadily got pushed to the bottom. Maybe if editors were focusing on addressing specific aspects of the film, cinematography, direction, writing, acting, and presenting reviews and quotations that were relevant to those topics, then there wouldn't be such a hunger to focus on stars and and DVD case blurbs. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Film
Hi there, re: this, the WikiProject Film community (as well as WikiProject Video Games, since we're talking about it) widely shuns the use of "mixed to ____" or in this case "positive to mixed" phrasing. "Mixed" already means "positive and negative". "Positive to mixed" would mean "positive to positive and negative" which is completely meaningless. Further, the source you used indicates clearly at the top of the article that they thought the film received overwhelming response from critics. So how you construed that as somewhere between lukewarm response and positive is extraordinarily confusing. If anything it would support a "critical response was generally positive" summary (but noooo, not "overwhelming" because that would not be neutral language.) Finally, your inclusion of Rotten Tomatoes audience ratings goes directly against MOS:FILM, which you should be familiar with by now, particularly if you're involving yourself in GA drives. From the Manual of Style: "Do not include user ratings submitted to websites such as the Internet Movie Database or Rotten Tomatoes, as they are vulnerable to vote stacking and demographic skew." Please familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style for Film. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Teasers are not noteworthy. WP:TEASER
Re: these additions, per WP:TRAILER, teasers and trailers are not inherently noteworthy. You should familiarize yourself with MOS:FILM if you intend to edit film articles, since they represent community consensus. Pretty sure I've brought that up before. Oh yeah, here in the comments I left that went totally unanswered. The content also has nothing to do with release, and is contradictory, since you're saying Shinde decided not to use teasers, but used teasers. Please seek consensus for inclusion on the talk page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I had read those comments which you had brought up before here including this one. I had added content about trailers by taking an example of Waiting (2015 film) which is a GA. Mr. Smart ℒION  ⋠☎️✍⋡ 06:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * There's no assumption that whomever passed that article to GA is an expert in the film MOS or other local consensuses. For instance, Waiting still uses INRConvert in the infobox. What is important is that people who are writing film articles and trying to get them passed, are experts in the film MOS and are editing accordingly. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for taking the Dear Zindagi issues to WT:FILM. They're a good group of people who are happy to help, and I hope you take advantage of their availability more often. One thing that is problematic in my perspective, is that Indian cinema article editors tend to think of themselves as existing in a world unto themselves. Not true, all the Indian film articles are part of WikiProject Film, so it's good to get familiar with these people and what community standards are. I appreciate that you took a chance to branch out. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Bhoot Aaya.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bhoot Aaya.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Kapil Sharma Show
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Kapil Sharma Show you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 08:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Kapil Sharma Show
The article The Kapil Sharma Show you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Kapil Sharma Show for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 04:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Love You Zindagi.ogg


A tag has been placed on File:Love You Zindagi.ogg, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. (See section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
 * It is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use. (See section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 10:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Love You Zindagi.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Love You Zindagi.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 12:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Roke Na Ruke.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Roke Na Ruke.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 14:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Aankhein Milayenge Darr Se.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aankhein Milayenge Darr Se.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 14:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Voice (Indian TV series)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Voice (Indian TV series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 18:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Meenakshi Arya for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meenakshi Arya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meenakshi Arya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk |c|em ) 12:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Voice (Indian TV series)
The article The Voice (Indian TV series) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Voice (Indian TV series) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 17:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

The Voice (Indian TV series)

 * Thanks for the Barnstar! Mr. Smart ℒION  ⋠☎️✍⋡ 06:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Battle for Bittora (film) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Battle for Bittora (film). Since you had some involvement with the Battle for Bittora (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 00:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

File:The Kapil Sharma Show set.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Kapil Sharma Show set.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aashiqui 3
Hello Mr. Smart LION,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aashiqui 3 for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mark  Dask  10:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Request
Sir Mr. Smart LION I am from Jodhpur, Rajasthan and I am work with you on creating articles about Bollywood actors,TV shows,films and actresses. but I am not proper knows about editing please help me! please reply on My Talk Page Thank you and I am waiting for your messages. thanks once again.(World556 (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC))

Proposed deletion of Dragon (2017 film)


The article Dragon (2017 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Should we have an article for a movie that hasn't even started filming yet? I mean, at this point, the movie is more of "an idea" than it is something that is worthy of an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kellymoat (talk) 17:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Dragon (2017 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dragon (2017 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dragon (2017 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY 2008 11:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Hunterrr 2 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hunterrr 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hunterrr 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Jupitus Smart  18:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sher-e-Punjab Maharaja Ranjit Singh.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sher-e-Punjab Maharaja Ranjit Singh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Ajay Devgan has been nominated for discussion
Category:Ajay Devgan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Skr15081997 (talk) 04:17, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to The Voice (India season 1) (Vandalism) June 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Voice (India season 1), you may be blocked from editing. You are editing the corrections and putting the wrong one. This should not happen again. This is vandalising a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.196.144.87 (talk) 10:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sher-e-Punjab Maharaja Ranjit Singh.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sher-e-Punjab Maharaja Ranjit Singh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of programmes broadcast by &TV for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of programmes broadcast by &TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of programmes broadcast by &TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 18:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

coaching
I'm am the former coach of Jacob liddle I have been coaching for the past 4 years since 2011 I coached him when he was at Wadalba and I want to return to coaching I miss it badly I want to be assistant coach at tigers and to get know for coaching my mate liddle I'm proud of him i really want to return to coaching — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brett321 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dear Zindagi
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dear Zindagi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bluesphere -- Bluesphere (talk) 07:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dear Zindagi
The article Dear Zindagi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dear Zindagi for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bluesphere -- Bluesphere (talk) 14:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dear Zindagi
The article Dear Zindagi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dear Zindagi for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bluesphere -- Bluesphere (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for List of accolades received by Neerja
Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ekroop Bedi


A tag has been placed on Ekroop Bedi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  SahabAli wadia  09:04, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Citations in lead
Hi there, re: this, there is no prohibition on citations in the lead. See MOS:LEADCITE. The suggestion that GAs don't have references in the lead is totally unfounded, and the knee-jerk removal of references is short-sighted, as obvious references are very helpful when trying to spot vandalism. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * First of all, those articles which you have mentioned here are neither GAs nor are related to any film. Suggestion that GA film articles don't have references in the lead are mostly founded. Even if it does not have references in the lead, what wrong has happened. The same information has been placed below in the article with reliable sources. And people cannot doubt that the information in the lead without references is fake, because they know that it is having GA icon and that it can't have any fake information. I hope I made myself clear. Mr. Smart  LION  03:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Siddhi (TV series)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Siddhi (TV series). HindWiki (Love My India) •  Talk to Hindustani !  14:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)