User talk:Mr1sandman

Scott Backes
Would you move the page to "Scott Backes" in accordance with naming conventions? An occupation is not usually needed, and makes it more difficult for people to find. 69.181.249.189 (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Try again, this time using just his name per WP:NAME. 69.181.249.189 (talk) 08:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Backes/ American Alpine Climber


A tag has been placed on Scott Backes/ American Alpine Climber, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  08:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Scott Backes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Backes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scott Backes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wuh Wuz  Dat  18:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi, go to Articles for deletion/Scott Backes and state your case there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:19, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Scott Backes is notable, in my opinion
Hello, I've added references to the article, and tried to improve it. Thanks for starting the article. What do you think? Cullen328 (talk) 05:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comment. Normal practice is to add new comments to the bottom of a talk page.  You sign your talk page comments by adding a series of four tildes (~) to the end of your comment.  That will add your signature.  The most important thing that a good article needs is  references to reliable sources.  Whenever you see something in blue, you can click on it for more information. There is a lot to learn, but it would be great if you decide to stick around and create more articles (or improve the ones that already exist).  You can comment on the deletion discussion by clicking the link at the top of Scott Backes.  For example, you could click "edit" then at the bottom, type an asterisk, three single quotes, the word Keep, then three more single quotes.  Then make a remark in your own words based on policy, such as that the reliable sources show that he is notable.  It's best not to argue but simply state a logical reason to keep an article.  Good luck, and feel free to ask me questions. Cullen328 (talk) 07:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC)