User talk:MrDankMeme

Famousbirthdays.com as a source
Hi MrDankMeme. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153). Similarly, wikia.com and earnthenecklace.com are also not reliable. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 18:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IDubbbzTV (December 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IDubbbzTV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IDubbbzTV, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:IDubbbzTV Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eddie891&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:IDubbbzTV reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eddie891 Talk Work 16:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jack Douglass has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:12, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jack Douglass was changed by MrDankMeme (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853446 on 2017-12-18T18:12:40+00:00.

February 2018
Friendly Notice:

Please don't use unconfirmed sources in your articles. Many articles that you have edited and have been reverted have been so as some of your edits are opinionative. This is an encyclopedia, not a place to express your own opinion. Thank you. FibonacciYYC (talk) 20:03, February 27, 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Filthy Frank confronting Weeaboo Jones.png
Thank you for uploading File:Filthy Frank confronting Weeaboo Jones.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:30, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Adding meme tags to articles
Articles need to be sourced as being Internet memes in the prose before this category can, or should be added. Otherwise this is your own original research, and against Wikipedia policy. Thank you.  Ss  112   06:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited It's Everyday Bro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/It%27s_Everyday_Bro check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/It%27s_Everyday_Bro?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hewett Tran


A tag has been placed on Hewett Tran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. RA 0808 talkcontribs 19:20, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please do not remove file deletion tags from file description pages on Wikipedia, as you did to File:Filthy Frank confronting Weeaboo Jones.png, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 19:52, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Your recent editing history at Westmount Charter School shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You and FibonacciYYC are both at 5RR and neither of you has attempted to discuss this edit on the article's talk page. '' Meters (talk) 00:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

WP:AN3
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. theinstantmatrix (talk) 00:51, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I have proposed that you be blocked unless you will respond to the complaint and promise to stop warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Unkle Adams
Hello, MrDankMeme,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Unkle Adams should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Unkle Adams.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

 Onel 5969  TT me 11:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lil Boat 2. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Generally you do not go around and change every instance of somebody's name, even if they have officially changed it. Read WP:COMMONNAME. Thanks.  Ss  112   08:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PewDiePie&#39;s Fiverr Contreversy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PewDiePie&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (IceJJFish) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating IceJJFish, MrDankMeme!

Wikipedia editor Jjjjjjdddddd just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I thought this page was going to be trash, but this is actually a good start! Keep it up!"

To reply, leave a comment on Jjjjjjdddddd's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

File:The cover of Asian Jake Paul cropped to iDubbbz.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The cover of Asian Jake Paul cropped to iDubbbz.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. w umbolo  ^^^  20:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:iDubbbzTV a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. w umbolo  ^^^  20:47, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Tay
Hello MrDankMeme,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lil Tay for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 17:30, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Tay
Hello MrDankMeme,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lil Tay for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 20:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Tay
Hello MrDankMeme,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lil Tay for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:47, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Audio from one of Lil Tay&#39;s Instagram videos, specifically the one that caused her mom to leave her job.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Audio from one of Lil Tay&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)


 * This is not a game. Based on your attitude and repetitive unblock requests, I have revoked your access to this page. You may use WP:UTRS for appeals.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Bbb23, I know MrDankMeme and I can confirm that he likely got blocked because of somebody using the same IP address. Additionally, WP:LITTLEBROTHER is not Wikipedia policy. C5d1 (talk) 20:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Moon Man - Notorious KKK.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Moon Man - Notorious KKK.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  ONR  (talk)  01:31, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Retired YouTubers has been nominated for discussion
Category:Retired YouTubers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Störm  (talk)  09:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:3PAC - RAP GOD.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:3PAC - RAP GOD.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)