User talk:MrDante1047

February 2023
Hi MrDante1047! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. IceWelder &#91; &#9993; &#93; 12:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Editing of system shock
Why are you continuing to delete my edits when i provided links in talk sessions proving my statement. I just find it difficult to insert it in references. MrDante1047 (talk) 13:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)


 * As noted multiple times, the lead and infobox should contain the primary genre of a game, not every subgenre individual gameplay elements could fit into. For more popular games, most sources tend to have a consensus on what the primary genre is; for example, System Shock is generally characterized as a first-person shooter. The game does not have the hallmark characteristics outlined in the horror and survival genre articles, it is merely based in a dark atmosphere. The blog of a key shop website would not be considered authorative anyways. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 13:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Most articles dont think they shpuld speak about the genre. Genre box is for filling every type of genre the game is about rigjt. When have genres been only singular. Games can countain several genres. Basically its the remake of the 1st game which was horror as well. Second game was surival horror. Gaming Bolt which is one of the leading sites about gaming as well as magazines claims it to be horror. I cannot post the link due to some error but you are free to instantly google it

MrDante1047 (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Most articles say its the renake of the forst game which like its sequel were sci fi survival horror. I cant post several reliable articoes due to edit not saved problem MrDante1047 (talk) 13:57, 25 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Please start a discussion on the game's article's talk page with these sources and ask for input from other users. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 14:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 01:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

If u want to escape the truth go on and block people. Howeber i show you proofs you continue skepticism which is not effective at all MrDante1047 (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 02:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Atomic Heart (video game). soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * You've been blocked for the same reason, and you're back at it again. Stop changing the genre without consensus. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 09:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Because of removed legal threat, I have revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:10, 19 March 2023 (UTC)