User talk:MrHeisenberg

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, MrHeisenberg. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page ManyChat, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 15:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello MrHeisenberg. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to ManyChat, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MrHeisenberg. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 15:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Herpetogenesis! In fact, I will not receive any compensation for this article. I am interested in IT and the product itself. It seemed to me that it is strange that the company that Forbes, TechCrunch and others write about in detail is not represented on Wikipedia. When writing, I relied on the sources given in the article (not the official site, except for the name and description of features). In any case, I'm ready to correct the article and propose it from the draft to the mainspace. --MrHeisenberg (talk) 16:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * You will have to explain why it looks exactly like it's been written by the company itself or a PR firm. At the very least, you need to declare your COI, which is highly obvious, and then you can submit it through AfC. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 17:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I am also sure that you did not write all of the draft. Who provided this pre-approved draft to you for publication? HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 17:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I am experienced in editing Wikipedia in another language. I base myself on other rules out of habit (of course, I got acquainted with the rules of the en.wikipedia). After all, what I will definitely define in my language as an advertisement will not be so obvious for you as a native speaker and vice versa. I really don't want to make excuses, but maybe it did. Could you explain what AfC is? --MrHeisenberg (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I wrote the whole text myself. First, I collect all the links into a Word, and then work with the document. Only then I supplement the article. Sometimes I consult my English-speaking friend about the speech patterns, but no more. --MrHeisenberg (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Dear Herpetogenesis. Sorry did not wait for your reply.
 * I am ready to take on the correction of the article, clean it from spam messages, advertisements, etc. With your help, or with the help of other participants (as I said, it turned out to be more difficult to see spam in another language than I thought).
 * I cannot prove that I have no COI, and that I wrote this solely assuming good faith. But I think a good article is possible and I want to make a useful contribution to the encyclopedia. As I understand it, I need to get your permission first. If not, then I will leave this idea, but please do not make quick conclusions. Faithfully yours --MrHeisenberg (talk) 17:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry that I can't do anything about this situation, since it's really obvious what this is all about. Wish you luck. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 13:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ManyChat logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:ManyChat logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:ManyChat
Hello, MrHeisenberg. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ManyChat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 15:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Guvenc Donmez
Hello, MrHeisenberg. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guvenc Donmez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Guvenc Donmez


Hello, MrHeisenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guvenc Donmez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)