User talk:MrKIA11/Archive 4

Issues with Moving Articles
User Despatche is moving articles such as Dariusburst without a debate. Please look over his talk page and contributions. He is a vandal or troll. I am not going to undo his bad edits again for Dariusburst and related articles.

Read debate Wikipedia talk:Archive 79 "Darius Burst naming"

Devilmanozzy (talk) 05:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for removing that article!

 * ) It was nice of you.

Bathtub453 (talk) 19:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Can you bring back Shopizer page please
I am evaluating software similar to this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OFBiz and Shopizer

Thanks

Csamson001 (talk) 16:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

National Tradesmen Day--Deleted
Is there a way for me to edit my post so that it is no longer in violation of code ? The intention of the content was to inform people about the newly announced National Tradesmen Day. I have drafted some changes to remove the IRWIN Tools branding but cannot figure out how to apply them now that the article has been deleted. I am also welcome to any suggestions from you on what content may need to be rewritten. Just want to make sure we get this right! Thanks Abaker1067 (talk) 21:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

CanvasM page
Dude its a 100 million dollar Indian company. Who are you to delete its page. Stay away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohit.pandharkar (talk • contribs) 01:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Jesuit (band) deleted?
Hey I'm just trying to figure out why the Jesuit (band) page got deleted. The band had members of multiple notable bands like Converge, Dillinger Escape Plan, Doomriders, etc which in turn makes them notable doesn't it?Amvymra (talk) 17:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Stephen Downes food critic
Just wonerding why you deleted the Stephen Downes entry which was absoluty factual. Australian restaurant critics who aremuch lees experienced (Pat Nourse) and included and Stephen Downes is the longest serving in Australia. I propose the article be reinstated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edcharles (talk • contribs) 02:16, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Please help me
Can you please fix Sockpuppet investigations/Fanfare25. When I first created it, I accidentally opened it under Fanfare35 instead of Fanfare25, and so now it is all messed up. Can you please fix it? JDDJS (talk) 16:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. It's all in order now. JDDJS (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Anythingyouwant
Anythingyouwant,this User is delated all my Article's...Please make this stopAnythingyouwant Dilek2 (talk) 20:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi
Thanks for the quick speedy there. I'm going to move the previously deleted page from late March, which is currently in my userspace, back to the article space to further facilitate the existing deletion review on the initial version of the article and thus also prevent further recreation. It also allows anyone wishing to contribute to do so on my working copy until a decision is made. CycloneGU (talk) 04:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Done with deletion review tag added. Thanks again.  CycloneGU (talk) 04:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Howl’s Moving Castle
Because they are unnecessary. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 15:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Look Look...I deleted my OWN Article....WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Yu must to be Happy isn't it?

LOL

Dilek2 (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Nail Yakupov
You deleted Nail Yakupov, however he just recently won the OHL Rookie of the Year, and therefore now meets criteria #4 of WP:NHOCKEY. This new information was included in the new article, so G4 doesn't apply. Please retore this article. Dolovis (talk) 00:39, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Record Golf?
What was the necessity/cause behind your deleting of the Record Golf post? It is a real sport in the Fox valley and is growing, so I don't see why it is a "blatant hoax" for me to try and legitimize the sport further by posting a simple page on wikipedia... I would ask that you reevaluate and add it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan3773 (talk • contribs) 07:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Ryan3773 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan3773 (talk • contribs) 07:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi
Could you please handle this article, The Future of Iraq. I ask you since you deleted this author's last article, The future of the middle east, and I hate figuring out which way I should get it deleted, by what criteria and so forth. Thanks, Passionless   -Talk  06:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Jaggi Gardens, Ambala City, Haryana, India
Hello ,

Please undelete article about my residence. Jaggi Gardens, Ambala City, Haryana, India I do not have the contents with me now and I spend so much time out of my work schedule to make people aware about my residence.

thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.129.10 (talk) 20:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * As the deletion comment said, it was just advertising, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Also, if you wish to continue this conversation, please do so while logged in. Thank you, MrKIA11 (talk) 10:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

National Tradesman Day--Restore
If you would restore it for me to edit, that would be great. Abaker1067 (talk) 18:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I made edits. Is the current version acceptable? Thanks for your help. Abaker1067 (talk) 12:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Can you make the page public and remove the advertising "warning banner" based on my changes?Abaker1067 (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Arbuthnot Securities Logo.png
The Licensing for this image was correct as I have permission from the author and owner of Arbuthnot Securities to use their logo for the Wikipedia article that I'm writing. I stated this within the summary. Can you explain to me why you have then deleted the image? I'm trying to prevent Arbuthnot Securities going through the laborious and pointless task of gaining an OTRS permission. Biggleswiki (talk) 13:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the speedy response, but why is the option given? Not your fault but I still don't understand why the option is in the list. I have permission to use the logo only on Wikipedia so I'll just get an OTRS license from the company then. Biggleswiki (talk) 14:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

The Biggest Loser: Couples 4.5
Mason Pearmain's Edit: MrKIA11, I'm calling you out! you deleted my favorite Wikipedia Article: The Biggest Loser: Couples 4.5. It is not a hoax! It is an un-aired season! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.127.209.53 (talk) 01:03, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you have a reliable source to prove it? MrKIA11 (talk) 01:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation on SirEpicBob
I see that you removed the template from Sockpuppet investigations/SirEpicBob. Unfortunately this left the page without any status, and if I hadn't happened to find it, it might have lingered unseen and undealt with for a long time. For future reference, if I understand it correctly, the thing to do in a case like this is to remove the "CUrequest" parameter, but leave in place. JamesBWatson (talk) 00:14, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's the first time that I've dealt with a sockpuppet, and I used Twinkle for the original post, so when I later changed it manually, that was the problem. Thanks for letting me know, MrKIA11 (talk) 01:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Regarding the Ecopunk article removal
Hi there! I'm new to wikipedia so I don't really know all the rules, but you just deleted my Ecopunk page due to "ambiguous copyright infringement", and I'd just like to say that I'm also the creator of the original page you referred to, and I can't really do infringement on my own stuff, can I? :P Frankichiro (talk) 00:54, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * If you will excuse the talk page stalking, I have responded to this message at User talk:Frankichiro. JamesBWatson (talk) 01:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, your response was better than mine would have been. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:55, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Deleted Summit Herald 12-13-79
Hi! You deleted the image I uploaded, and the code suggests it might be because I hadn't yet included it in the page I'm making. I wasn't going to do that until the photo got approved; it serves as a citation for one of the claims on the page. Can you help me figure out the protocol here? If it was deleted because it wasn't included in any page, could you undelete it so that I can include it?

Thanks- Vzafrin (talk) 13:36, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi - so, any news on this? -- Whoops, sorry, you replied elsewhere. Thanks. Vzafrin (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Chaoyang Town
The DAB page was "obviously unnecessary" if there were never going to be any articles on any of the entries on the list. That you did not even bother to notify me is at best a gross violation of standard conduct and at worse cynicism on your part. Now that there is an article on even one entry on that list, reinstate the DAB page NOW or I will consider opening a de-admin on you. I simply don't create DAB pages if I feel they are not necessary. -- HXL's Roundtable  and  Record  17:09, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Restore Irish Defence Forces Heraldry
Could you restore this page. You marked it as "Article has no meaningful, substantive content". I was in the process of putting together a page displaying all the heraldry of the Irish Defence Forces as no such article exists on wikipedia. U3island (talk) 10:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Ok I see what you say about the Irish Defence Forces unit flashes but many current and former members or the Permanent and Reserve Defence Forces would consider them notable. Unfortunately, without them going up, no one will be able to add to their history and origin and sadly this will be lost with time. To overcome this somewhat I will post them on my own profile page. With the removal of Bailerweb from the internet, Unit Flashes will sadly become unavailable to the general public. U3island (talk) 01:28, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Midway Gardens
Hi, sorry to not put anything up right away on the Midway Gardens page. I'm posting a stub now and collaborating with a group to fill in the article. Can you hold off a few days before deleting if there isn't quite enough content to stay up yet? Thanks. Shifra t (talk) 00:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

The page is fleshed out now, can I revert it back from my userpage? Shifra t (talk) 03:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

AFD headers
Thanks for fixing that... I had a feeling it wasn't quite right. Catfish Jim  &#38; the soapdish  20:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Participate in White Latin American's AfD
Please, participate in this discussion by adding your opinion and arguments why it should be kept, or why it should not. --Pablozeta (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Cocacola man by paul ro.12-05-07.jpg
Ha, I knew that would happen :-) One asks a question at Media_copyright_questions/Archive/2011/April, and when I implement the given answer, someone disagrees (yourself).  Never mind it will be gone in a week.  Images are such a minefield...  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It just so happens that today makes it a week, so I just deleted it. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LeaveDogLights/Hotel Carolina
Would you explain how the consensus at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LeaveDogLights/Hotel Carolina was in favor of a redirect? Cunard (talk) 17:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I feel that SmokeyJoe explained the best why it makes sense. TPH's delete vote sounded to me like it was a weak delete just because he thought that redirects from userspace were not allowed. And history merges just seem unnecessary as I explained in the closing statement. Plus, would you have expected the redirect to be suppressed when merging the pages? Your opposition to redirects seems to be that you think that they are unnecessary, but I don't see how they hurt anything. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Please history merge the userspace drafts to the articles. A history merge allows all the editing to the draft to be kept in one place. I do not believe that the history of an article's evolution should be splintered into several pages. I have no opinion on whether the redirect should be suppressed. SmokeyJoe agreed to a redirect at 12:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC), and I switched to history merge because I find that a more satisfactory result than "delete" or "redirect with the splintered history buried in the history". Cunard (talk) 19:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * But have you looked at the histories? They are each a single edit; there is no evolution. There is no real substantial history to merge. As far as Hotel Carolina, the only difference is a paragraph which was considered advertising. What's the point? MrKIA11 (talk) 19:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * If, as you say, there is no "real substantial history to merge", that is more an argument to delete. However, in light of SmokeyJoe's arguments, I recognize that may have some use of this content; he may want to "keep records of all their work". I maintain that keeping the history in one place is better than splintering it. That there was a paragraph considered advertising in Hotel Carolina is also valuable information that should be preserved in the article's history. It reveals the creator's motivations and possible conflict of interest with the festival. Having it in another place prevents editors from easily assessing the article's origin. Cunard (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The edit summary of the creating edit said that they removed the section of advertising to be able to post it. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:34, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I have reviewed the paragraph that was considered advertising and do not consider it to be advertising. I have similar quotes in Santa's Village (Jefferson, New Hampshire). The content at the userspace draft is not "unambiguously promotional". Would you review the deleted version of Hotel Carolina and confirm whether it and the userspace draft have the same content? Cunard (talk) 19:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, identical. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:56, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Because the quotes from Tony Lucca and Ernie Halter are fitting touches to the article, please history merge User:LeaveDogLights/Hotel Carolina and Hotel Carolina so that the quotes may be restored. Cunard (talk) 20:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * How can I justify that if that was determined to be advertising before? MrKIA11 (talk) 23:48, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Please explain how that paragraph is "advertising". Save for, no one has considered that paragraph of quotes from two notable musicians to be advertising. Cunard (talk) 23:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

The user that marked it for CSD and the admin that deleted it. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:57, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Ohconfucius and DGG have not specifically objected to those quotes. I find those quotes not promotional at all. They add depth to the article through the participants' personal experiences. I ask again: Please explain how, in your opinion, that paragraph is "advertising" that should be omitted from the article. Cunard (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't say that I agree that it is advertising, but the page was deleted with the paragraph, even being sourced, but it was kept without it. I'm not sure what guidelines would apply in this situation. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The page was probably tagged and deleted in error. The guidelines do not prohibit the restoration of unproblematic content. Cunard (talk) 00:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * So then you're questioning the judgement of both users? Obviously the question is whether the content is questionable. I'm talking about a guideline for content that was at once considered advertising, but is not considered so by a second judgement. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am questioning their judgment. A well-sourced article about a notable topic should not be speedy deleted if there are easily-remedied tone concerns. There is no evidence that they considered that paragraph to be advertising. They may have speedied the recreated article that lacked that paragraph. Even if they did object to the content, the policy/guideline for your last sentence is consensus can change. Cunard (talk) 00:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I realize that there is no way I can convince you, and this is a trivial issue to begin with, so I just merged the useless edit. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for merging the edit which provides the necessary GFDL attribution of how presented the content. Cunard (talk) 02:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Talkback to Talk Page Other Than my Own
The AfD link is there. Notice it's red. It claimed it was speedied, but oddly the article still exists? Odd. CycloneGU (talk) 23:59, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All right, all appears well now. That was confusing, he double-linked it at the AfD but the page was deleted shortly after being created; that caused the confusion on both our parts.  CycloneGU (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

The cleanup tool you are using is broken ...
... or you made a mistake by hand. See this edit. The edit summary claimed that you were fixing a DEFAULTSORT problem. What you actually did was removing a categorisation that is perfectly valid per WP:Categorizing redirects. If the tool is broken please let me know so that I can notify the maintainer. If it was your mistake, please keep in mind that there are legitimate reasons for categorising certain redirects, and that any errors you make in that area can easily be missed as redirects usually don't have many watchers. Thank you. Hans Adler 09:49, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * That was my fault. I was unaware of the guideline. Thanks for letting me know. Luckily that's the only one I've done like that. MrKIA11 (talk) 10:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Great. Thanks for cleaning up after me. Hans Adler 10:08, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 03:48, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

/to do
Hey KIA. I like how you added deletion to the todo list. However, the right side looks like it has more stuff on its side. Do you know how to move the CotW part to the left? GamerPro64 (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I know how to, but it would be much more unbalanced if I did. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, do you know to make it balanced? GamerPro64 (talk) 17:57, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * There is no way to get it any better than it is now. I actually think it is pretty balance right now. I even tried different resolutions to see if the right side would become much longer, but it doesn't really. How much longer does the right side look to you? MrKIA11 (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Admittedly, I am on my Android right now and it makes the right side look bigger by only a little bit. GamerPro64 (talk) 18:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Crytek
See WT:VG/IPC. Responded there. --Izno (talk) 23:00, 13 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Hmm, there's a few templates (userboxes) lying around. What to do? --Izno (talk) 06:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete
I created 1976 in fiction and 1989 in fiction. While the first was moved to "Works_of_fiction_set_in_1976", 1989 was deleted. Would you restore it and move it to "Works_of_fiction_set_in_1989"? J 1982 (talk) 21:23, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * What is the point of splitting these sections into new articles? MrKIA11 (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Please restore these. You deleted them via speedy a10, which, as WP:CSD specifically says, "does not include split pages " .   DGG ( talk ) 21:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * First of all, I was only involved in 1989, not 1976. I will restore it because upon further inspection, A10 did not apply because the main article did not contain the information at that time, although I was going off of the link provided within the article. Yet, I don't see what justifies the information having its own article. I don't get why it was deleted from the main article in the first place. WP:SPLIT does not apply to this. That only refers to the length of pages, and this does not make the main page any significantly smaller, and the new page almost falls under the general guideline that 'If an article or list has remained [<1 KB] for over a couple of months, consider combining it with a related page.' So I think the information should exist, but in the main page, not by itself. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:45, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Whether it should have its own article is another question. The reason why perhaps it should is the possibility for very considerable expansion. Normally the practice as been to separate anything expandable with presently ≥3 entries, so that they will form a series. For these, I can easily see expanding it yet further, into books, movies, etc. Nobody has done the work just yet, and I don't usually do it either, but I guess I should keep my eye out more for possibilities. I think such lists potentially an extremely useful feature, and we're the best suited to compile them. It would make a nice project.    DGG ( talk ) 00:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well I'll restore and move it, and hopefully it does get expanded one day. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And all articles like 2001 in fiction should be moved to Works of fiction set in 2001 and other years. J 1982 (talk) 11:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I was about to, but once I realized how many there are, there is no way. I'm sure you can put in bot request to move them all. MrKIA11 (talk) 02:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, do that. J 1982 (talk) 09:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Haha. As much as I wish I had 25 hours in a day, I was saying that you could put in a request. It's not difficult, and you'll be able to explain the reasoning behind it. MrKIA11 (talk) 09:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I think I've moved them all now. It was not so many. J 1982 (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Hannah de Rothschild.jpg
Hi there, in relation to your deletion of File:Hannah de Rothschild.jpg, can you please undelete that as the uploader has requested that the local copy be kept, and we are supposed to honour such requests. See for further info. Thanks, --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 07:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 07:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I restored it, but may I asked why you then tagged the image with ? MrKIA11 (talk) 07:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, under Criteria_for_speedy_deletion even though it was tagged with Now Commons, because it has Keep local it doesn't meet the criteria for deletion, and hence our local copy should be kept out of courtesy to the person who asked for it to be kept. There's no harm in placing now commons on image pages, unless one doesn't see the request to keep the local copy. --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 08:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * And that's the reason I don't understand the benefit of it. Since says it's on Commons, why also place, and possibly confuse silly admin like me that never realized that requesting to keep the local copy even existed? MrKIA11 (talk) 08:07, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Please
Check, Over The Limit (2011), Talk:Over The Limit (2011). Thanks. 187.91.49.178 (talk) 05:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you want me to check. You want me to delete it? MrKIA11 (talk) 05:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Correct, reason Articles for deletion/Over the Limit (2011) and Article Incubator/Over the Limit (2011). 187.91.49.178 (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ MrKIA11 (talk) 05:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of template
Hello! Template:Afd main, which you deleted last month, is used as a pre-loaded template in the box at WP:AFD. As you've deleted the template, using that box for starting an AFD no longer works. Also, this template is not meant to be transcluded, so it's not un-natural that the template doesn't have any transclusions. Could you consider restoring the template? Otherwise I have to remove that WP:AFD section. Thanks in advance, Hey  Mid  (contribs) 17:59, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Personally, I don't see why that section exists. It seems like it is encouraging people to not follow the normal process. Even if it does stay though, couldn't you just replace it with ? What's the difference? MrKIA11 (talk) 20:14, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't know that template existed. Thanks. Hey  Mid  (contribs) 21:22, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Danke
As soon as he comes on again I will let him know the page has been moved. Danke. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:29, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Riserless Light Well Intervention
Hi MrKIA11. You deleted my picture, could you please explain why. What it because I did not provide enough information in the text box? Statoil approved to use the picture on Wikipedia as long as I credited the illustration to Statoil.

Regards

Heijacob (talk) 16:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * There were 2 problems actually. First of all, an image cannot be limited for use only on Wikipedia since anyone can use any image on here for anything. This is the primary reason the image was deleted. The second issue is even if the copyright holder allows the use of the image, it will have to be more formally allowed, such as through OTRS, as simply stating that you were allowed to use it is unfortunately not good enough. Let me know if you have any other questions. MrKIA11 (talk) 16:38, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Regarding Database reports/Ownerless pages in the user space
Hi. Apologies for taking so long to get back to you about your issue with the database report. I've replied to you here. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:51, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Scouting Ireland S.A.I.png
Thank you for the move, but somehow the image itself has gone missing, can you restore it?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It's been fixed, thanks again!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I love those problems that just fix themselves when you're not looking. Glad I could help. MrKIA11 (talk) 02:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)