User talk:MrLiberty

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Maps And Atlases
The link from "List of math rock groups" doesn't count towards an inclusion. That's just a list and each mbandlisted is required to meet the guidelines at Notability (music). However, I agree that being included in Guitar Player may be enough to qualify them. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Got it, thanks for the reinclusion, we'll watch to make sure they can stand the (short) test of time -- if for some reason they don't step up to that next level, I'll request deletion if it hasn't already been done. MrLiberty 04:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * If you can find a few more references for them it would be a good thing. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Definitely. I just added a New City Chicago (medium-sized print newspaper) review, as well as a Cincinnati CityBeat review by a noted reviewer (Mike Breen) who reviews large well-known bands, too.  What is the best way to reference printed articles without a web link, especially if they are major media outlets?  The Guitar Player link was advantageous because they were in the print issue as well, but it is hard to verify easily for any magazine that doesn't archive online.  Considering the Math Rock genre is tiny but growing and there are very few bands who exist within that genre, I still believe there is good cause for inclusion.  No other current/contemporary Math Rock band has received any acclaim at all.  Maps And Atlases is being courted for label representation as well, and is currently picking up tour dates with large bands (Digital Underground in October, etc).  MrLiberty 04:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If it's a book then it's easy to cite but I'm not sure about magazines. You might try Citing sources for information. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

A. B. Dada
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A. B. Dada, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. Virago 09:34, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Unanimocracy
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Unanimocracy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. Virago 09:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Mapsandatlases.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Mapsandatlases.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Closedmouth (talk) 12:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)