User talk:MrMajors/Archive 1

world of spectrum
Hello mr majors, we have to find a compromise here as I don't plan to drop this relevant aspect from the page. Please offer a reformulation proposal, with further reverting we will not progress here. Cheers Shaddim (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I can't see any way that any further details of the ISDA incident can be included on the page because there are no reliable sources. The owner of World of Spectrum stating that the 'case' was 'retracted' is obviously biased, and the actual correspondence that should be at http://www.worldofspectrum.org/showwrap.cgi?case=idsa/DMCA-922932.case is not available. Claiming that the site continued is irrelevant considering that the ISDA didn't actually identify any specific titles that were being distributed by the site. MrMajors (talk) 10:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Currently the impact of the DMCA impact is not explained at all, vice versa, the missing context indicates erroneously to a reader that the copyright request was successful. It is very well relevant as context to this case that the website itself continued to distribute their content for another decade, this is an undisputed fact. And, that the website claims, that the reason for the unhindered continued distribution of their content, was that the retraction of the request, which is an fact. What we can't prove is that the request was really retracted. But this doesn't matter as this wasn't claimed to describe the situation. What is relevant that this request was ineffective and had no legal consequences. So, I will step forward and clarify the currently unexplained situation with an additional sentence. Refrain from nonconstructive reverts this time, we have more tools than that in our belt as editor. Shaddim (talk) 21:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've reworded it again to clarify why the IDSA letter was mistaken and that World of Spectrum's statement about the case being retracted was just a claim they made. I've kept the continued distribution statement in, but dropped 'unhindered' as that can't be verified. MrMajors (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Super Buster Bros. move
Hi, after 5 days I have removed the speedy tag from Super Pang to make way for a move from Super Buster Bros.. Please open a requested move discussion at Talk:Super Buster Bros. to argue the case for the move. The notes you made at Talk:Super Pang are a good start. I do think discussion is needed because it is clearly widely known under boths names, and partly because several admins (including me) must have looked at this over 5 days and opted not to speedily delete. Fences &amp;  Windows  12:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Why are you vandalising the world of spectrum page?
Please refrain from editing the page with lies and mis-direction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fogartylee (talk • contribs) 19:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * As admin of the site you should be aware that editing the entry for your own site is a classed as self-promotion and is frowned upon here. Everything on the page is accurate regardless of your own beliefs. MrMajors (talk) 07:08, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, World of Spectrum, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:03, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on World of Spectrum. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 19:13, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Administrators' notice board
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is World of Spectrum. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 19:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 1 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Super Hang-On page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=732549755 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F732549755%7CSuper Hang-On%5D%5D Ask for help])