User talk:MrMuscle007

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Stisen


A tag has been placed on Daniel Stisen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 00:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MrMuscle007


A tag has been placed on User:MrMuscle007 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JustBerry (talk) 22:43, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Delete
Just Larry, why are you trying to delete me? I have not done anything wrong. And I’ve done no vandalism.

If you ref to the info “Retribution film” that’s suppose to be published as a wiki page and not on mr muscle page.. All info there is and can be documented. Please contact me in private. MrMuscle007 (talk) 23:03, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Stisen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Stisen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Stisen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_Stisen
Please tell me it was an accident that you deleted my comment from the discussion before adding your own. Skeletor3000 (talk) 01:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Skeletor3000, I don’t think i deleted anyone’s comments, If i did that would be by accident, and was not my intention. Only thing I would like to do is to challenge the deletion request in a honest way by providing more proofs or asking if we can improve any of the structure so it falls within any guide lines.
 * You clearly pressed the "undo" button to revert Skeletor3000's edit; it says as much on the diff. I certainly hope that it was in error, but it doesn't seem that way. Please be more careful in the future. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:10, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Do you accept my apology and let us provide more evidence for our claims for Stisen not to be deleted from Wiki? MrMuscle007 (talk) 02:11, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * What do you mean "our" claims? On the AfD you said something similar - "we could improve". Who is "we"? &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:14, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

I did not push undo button, if that happen, it happen by accident, and i was not aware of it. MrMuscle007 (talk) 02:12, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

PMC, Have i done anything wrong? I just think it would be Good for all great if I can provide more evidence? That would be a good thing. I hope I didn’t do anything wrong, I only have a good intention, and I would like to only challenge this deletion by proofs, thats all.

I wrote we, but I mean I. MrMuscle007 (talk) 02:25, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * You're free to provide sources at the deletion discussion; I restored your comment there. Most editors don't like to read a huge number of sources, so my recommendation is to pick the best three you can find and list those. Please read our reliable sources guideline and general notability guideline to get an idea of the kind of coverage we're looking for. I do have to ask though - are you Daniel Stisen, or a relative or otherwise involved with him personally or commercially? &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC)