User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive/Archive 29

List of programs broadcast by G4
Somebody keeps reverting the page, adding shows that even aired on the network to begin with, such as The 7D (a Disney XD show), America's Funniest Home Videos, and Ricidousness (an MTV original). The user who tried to right the wrongs got banned for doing his job. Can you please do something about it? Thank you. 2600:1004:B01C:12A3:CD2A:23A5:2EE1:E31F (talk) 15:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Jose Bolanos
Hello, Mrschimpf,

Whenever you tag a page for deletion, especially PRODs, please state this in the edit summary. In a PROD, if the tag gets removed, it needs to be clear that the article has already been PROD'd once because it can't be PROD'd a second time. The way this is seen is by looking at the edit summaries on the page. So, please when you tag a PROD, state this in the edit summary. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Whoops, I usually try to do that; sorry ! I'll definitely remember this for next time.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

help
on i league qualifiers, lot of format and few grammar errors

and please new logo is here

www.sportskeeda.com/amp/football/change-format-i-league-2nd-division — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.140.235.55 (talk) 05:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Edits To Twelve Tribes Article
Could you help me understand the reason for you to repeatedly revert my edits? I added to the article based on updated information. Since it would be proper, I included a reference in the form of a news article, for that edit. Someone removed it as redundant. I thought that to have been improper because the link I provided showed the information I added based on the new events of the story, while the old one didn’t. I therefore re-added it and respectfully put a note explaining why I did it. I then found you removed it. I opted instead of getting into an edit war, to just update the page to discuss the article. You reverted that with no explanation.

I mean respect, but what’s the reason for this? We shouldn’t have content like this that is not cited. Un-cited content can be removed. You won’t let me cite it. And you won’t let me at least put something in the article that would allow a reader to find the article. How are we supposed to make sure that Wikipedia is accurate if people can’t reference things, and as a result content gets removed as not cited content?

Thanks Bagofscrews (talk) 21:08, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello
I noticed that you have deleted my comment in the Articles for deletion/Kelli Stavast. I presume this was accidental and I've restored it, but I wanted to ping you in case the deletion was intentional so that we could discuss it. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 01:34, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Unsourced addition in Slappy and the Stinkers
This really doesn't seem like a minor edit. Do you know of a source for the "contractual minimums" content? – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 05:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

2022 Indianapolis 500 at AfD
Hello, I am sending notices to everyone who participated in the previous AfD that the article 2022 Indianapolis 500 has again been put up for AfD discussion at Articles for deletion/2022 Indianapolis 500 (2nd nomination). Have a lovely day. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 10:09, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Second opinion on reverted edits
Hello Mrschimpf,

Last night, I had two edits to WEPN (AM) and WEPN-FM reverted by BlueboyLINY, with the justification that Twitter was not a reliable source. While I would agree with that statement 99% of the time, the author of the tweet is a sports journalist for the New York Post, which I have found to be a generally reliable source for sports broadcasting information. The account I am quoting from is verified and I am reasonably sure that this tweet would inherit the reliability of the involved journalist. I did post a message on BlueboyLINY's user page, but I have not received a reply. I am reaching out to you because I noticed that you have interacted with this user in the past.

If you could review both of the reverted edits and get back to me on whether they were acceptable, that would be greatly appreciated. If not, I would be happy to restore the content and find a better source. Thank you in advance for your help. Dial (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Kryce Armonio
Hello, Mrschimpf,

Thank you for staying on this editor's edits and reverting when possible. I saw a bit of his work earlier in the day and, honestly, I wasn't sure whether he was writing a hoax or not. I'm just ignorant about telecommunication companies and there is a lot of editing activity around TV networks and tech companies. Now that he has been blocked and his work reverted, I can see how much effort was involved undoing his edits so I wanted to thank you for suspecting a problem and doing what you could to undo the damage to the project.

I hope you are having a pleasant holiday season! Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Question
Hello Mrschimpf, I made some contributions on some articles that you deleted. I understood that the broadcasting area is national because it is about the chain in America, I thought it was better to put international because it is exhibited all over the world. And from what you said putting world class series is not a very well seen but I would like to write that their series is successful all over the world because it is, but how do I write it? I understood the reason why you did that on both channels but why on the hijab when I didn't write false, women are no longer obliged to wear the veil but must dress decently. thanks for answering and explain to me. Rayan wind (talk) 10:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)