User talk:MrWhacker

Proposed deletion of Tea boy
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tea boy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. X MarX the Spot (talk) 01:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Your Sinclair official top 100
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Your Sinclair official top 100, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/your-sinclair-official-top-100.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi! You said in an edit summary, "the bot is in error!" . Did you write the sentences at the top of the article yourself, or get them from somewhere? Apparently other websites are copying the Wikipedia article, so there's some confusion. We need to establish who owns the copyright on those sentences (or we could re-word the sentences). Please answer at Talk:Your Sinclair official top 100. Thanks! Sorry for the confusion. ☺ Coppertwig (talk) 18:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi MrWhacker, I have deleted Your Sinclair official top 100, as it was decided not to have a copy of the list on Wikipedia; see the AfD discussion at Articles for deletion/Your Sinclair official top 100. If you disagree with that AfD result, then you will need to take it to WP:Deletion review. Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 09:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Tea boy
jimfbleak (talk) 05:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~.
 * This article had never been deleted before, although it has now
 * You should not remove speedy deletion tags yourself
 * I deleted the article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. Although it had a reference, it did not support what you were claiming in most of the article


 * Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~ . I thought you might want to know why it had been deleted, so I posted the reasons before deleting. The text is here. If you recreate and it is tagged for deletion again, do not remove the speedy deletion tags yourself. jimfbleak (talk) 05:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)