User talk:MrZachh

Hello MrZachh, welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately your recent edits have not been constructive ones. Would you mind reading our editing policies, see Vandalism. Please refrain from making further unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits so far appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lumos3 (talk) 09:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hillsborough, New Brunswick, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hillsborough, New Brunswick was changed by MrZachh (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-06-23T22:29:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Hillsborough, New Brunswick. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. – Tommy  [ message ] 22:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. I have deleted your page Dappy cackler. So far you appear to have made no constructive edits at all.

If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fainites barley scribs 21:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * cf User talk: 174.118.74.68, last edit 6th October 2010. Fainites barley scribs 22:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dappy Cackler


The article Dappy Cackler has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Pure original research. Probably a hoax like Dappy cackler.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scjessey (talk) 19:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I have already recently deleted two earlier versions of "Dappy cackler" nonsense and given a final warning for vandalism. This account has made no constructive edits. I have now blocked him for a month.Fainites barley scribs 20:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for creating nonsense pages and vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fainites barley scribs 21:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)