User talk:Mr Beige

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

-- Pamri &bull; Talk 13:03, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Your articles
Hi! As you've probably noticed already, I've been tagging your recently created articles in various ways... There are many people around creating articles with little or no content about themselves or other non-notable people, but I begin to see what you're trying to do. In order to avoid getting your articles deleted or tagged, try to make them obviously important. Present the person (full name, place and date of birth if possible, profession, personal history) etc. and let others know where you got the data from. Then also try to link them to other articles that are relevant, and use categories. Some of the people you're writing about are notable in their unique ways, but you have to make sure everybody notices it. Thanks. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:56, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Joytech
Joytech has been proposed for deletion. Take Pablo's advice to improve this article if you would like to see it kept. You might review WP:CORP for some relevant guidelines.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. NickelShoe 03:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

List of Nestle products
Hi there, I noticed that you created a list of Nestle products. Whilst it could be argued that there is a difference between "products" and "brands", I don't think that it is beneficial to have another list when we already have a list of Nestle brands. I notice that another user has made the product list into a redirect to the brand list; but generally it's not a good idea to duplicate or divide information for minor reasons.

Thanks for the effort all the same, and I look forward to seeing more of your contributions to Wikipedia! Fourohfour 11:35, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Casper
Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Caspar Electronics may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. -- Longhair 12:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

The article about Casper Electronics was only published for about 60 seconds before you deleted it! Please give me some time to finish it! /Mr Beige


 * templates substituted by a bot as per Template substitution Pegasusbot 06:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

List of Sculpture Parks
This is currently listed for deletion. I see that as a shame. I suggest you look at it and expand the data against each park with a short sentence on each in order further to assert the reasons to keep this page. One thing that would help greatly is a set of inbound links to the page from other pages.

I have stated my view that the article should be kept, but it is not up to me. Improving the article and saying that you have done so and intend to continue would go a long way towards saving it. To help you I have added the tag for an incomplete list. Fiddle Faddle 12:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Ackroyd & Harvey
The article Ackroyd & Harvey has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 16:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sidabitball
I've nominated Sidabitball, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Sidabitball satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Sidabitball and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Sidabitball during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Flyguy649talkcontribs 17:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Kjartan Slettemark
A "" template has been added to the article Kjartan Slettemark, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.163.242.225 00:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Jessie Pridemore
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jessie Pridemore, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. J 16:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Mr Beige! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ivy Gunter -

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Films involving amputees
Category:Films involving amputees, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Casper Electronics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casper Electronics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Casper Electronics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Busgirl (film)


The article Busgirl (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't meet any criteria of Notability (films)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geniac (talk) 03:51, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jennifer Krum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer Krum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jennifer Krum& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gnu 57 17:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)