User talk:Mr Discipline

Speedy deletion nomination of Damien Zygote
A tag has been placed on Damien Zygote requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jujutacular (talk) 02:32, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I saw your note on Talk:Damien Zygote. For notability issues, please see WP:BAND.  There was also, however, many unsourced claims in the article.  Ordinarily this is not a speedy deletion criteria (unless they indicate the article is a clear hoax).  Much of the content in this case, however, could be considered by some to be negative.  As such, it must be sourced to a WP:RS per the policy on biographies of living people.  I would encourage you to source everything in the article, but first and foremost, anything which might be considered negative needs to have a reliable reference.  Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 14:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)