User talk:Mr Snoidy Toy

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:16, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

This seems very generic. "One or more of the external links." Could you be more specific? In each and every case, I added factual information as well as "external links." Indeed, in one case I added three solid paragraphs of factual information. Thanks Mr Snoidy Toy (talk) 18:45, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not an advertising medium to promote a non-notable book. It's clear that this is a single purpose account. Also see WP:COI. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:04, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry: I do not see why I should be subject to your insults. My book, unread by you, is not "non-notable": I am a historian, and my book is in fact the first major work on the subject. Did you read my contributions to the Grain elevator entry? If you do, you will quickly see that the three paragraphs of solid factual information that I added to it ENRICHED it, and certainly didn't detract from it in any way. I referred to my own book because, if someone makes uses of the entry as a whole, I want proper credit for the research I've done.

As for your prediction [hic] that mine is a "single purpose account": you have not allowed a sufficient time to elapse to make such a judgment. If you had waited, you would have seen that my account was opened for several "purposes". Does not your judgment become a self-fulfilling prophecy if you discourage knowledgeable people from contributing? Mr Snoidy Toy (talk) 22:57, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It appears that you haven't read our COI policy. As you've admitted to being the author, I'm sure you can see how it applies here. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  13:23, 28 October 2010 (UTC)