User talk:Mr Store

April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Anchovy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. -- Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 23:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I have been edited.

Port Chicago disaster
The problem with the source you cited is that it appears to be a promotional page for the guy (Vogel) who is apparently trying to make a buck off of the theory that it was a nuclear explosion. You're welcome, of course, to explain why on the article's talk page that you believe the theory should be included in the article and why the source should be valid. You can also post it at WP:FTN with your reasoning and sources and see what the advisors there say. Since you're new to Wikipedia please leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions about how this all works. Cla68 (talk) 07:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The only other references I could find were other pages refering to Vogel's theory, which is very flawed on closer inspection so I'll suppose I leave it out. Mr Store (talk) 01:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)