User talk:Mr Sybil Hole

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Martin Fowler has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Strongjam (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Cheers, lads! Ye might as well block me but it's futile; there's a 24 hour account creation block but me mate or me mot will have created a new proxy by then. One minute I'm in Lesotho, the next I'm in Honduras. 745 and counting, and that's without all of my juvenilia (i.e. youthful IP jinks about helicopters, beercans and orchards) recorded as separate accounts in my file.

By the way, I was impressed with the fast, methodical nature of tonight's blocking - very efficient. I always had two favourite admins (I won't name them but I quickly developed a genuine respect for their politeness and efficiency in blocking me and reverting my edits) and although I can't remember who blocked me tonight, they were up there with the other two for excellence. :) I'm well aware that my disruption of Wikipedia is beyond a joke and in total contradiction of my principles; after all, I love reading Wikipedia articles for leisure and I have a deep respect for any community which shares knowledge so democratically, in spite of the potential pitfalls of that democracy. It is not out of any malice or grudge; rather, it is merely a silly little diversion. Thanks, Mr Sybil Hole (talk) 21:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)