User talk:Mr Twain

Hi, you keep removing an entry about Paul Brook using psychological explanations for his mentalism, on the grounds that it places him in the same status as the others mentioned. This is not the case, the sentance is clearly stating mentalists who perform with a psychological style. I would like to here your justifications on this point as it may well be my perspective.

Andrew Ternan 22:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

YouTube link
Oh, ok. Can you make sure it's indicated in the description at YouTube? I made a little html comment do someone won't accidentally remove it again. Have a nice day. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 00:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mentalist (derogatory slang)
An editor has nominated Mentalist (derogatory slang), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. Sideswipe9th (talk) 16:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Graham Linehan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sideswipe9th (talk) 16:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.