User talk:Mr Wiggles666

August 2017
Hello, I'm Zawl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jeremy Hunt— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Za  wl  08:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeremy Hunt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Za  wl  08:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jeremy Hunt. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:55, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

{{unblock | reason= edits where valid according to popular opinion. As everything is imaginary and only exists according to collective will my edits where in line with current feeling.

Hey, Edgar181, if you could unblock me that would be great. According to popular opinion my edits where correct. As most of what we view in the world only exists due to collective belief my edits were correct.

(Edgar181)
When you going to get round to unblocking me?