User talk:Mr little irish/Archive 1

Hiiiiii
Someone said welcome already but anyhays, I'm in the WikiProject Music too, and I just wanted to say you can ask me for advice if any is needed. ×××BrightBlackHeaven(talk)××× 19:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Wow, your the first person to actually properly talk to me though haha! That message up above was just for some hints and tips around here. Thanks very much for the welcome, and I shall not hesistate if I do need any advice. Thanks again. Mr little irish (talk) 14:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Erm...
Regarding pending changes/feedback, see User talk:RickK and here. :| TelCo NaSp   Ve :|   03:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, erm, yea, where am I supposed to be looking? Or even, what am I supposed to be looking at? Thanks It's Me (Speak to me) What have you done? 08:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, sorry for the confusion. I was looking at your response to me here. I thought that your ideas closely matched the ideas of those I pointed out in my comment above. :| TelCo  NaSp   Ve :|   19:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I couldn't find it on RickK's talk page lol. I feel that IP edits should be ban.... anyway you know lol. It's Me (Speak to me) What have you done? 09:11, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I restored the links again. Basically, what I'm trying to say is that what you said in the pending changes/feedback seems to echo what "they" said on RickK's talkpage. Oh, and I had this watchlisted in case you decided to respond--no need for any more talkback (templates). :| TelCo  NaSp   Ve :|   13:35, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Well watching it certainly makes it easier for me :) So is there any way of getting a good IP contribution scheme going, or putting it forward to the right people? it would reduce vandalism drastically. It's Me (Speak to me) What have you done? 07:58, 9 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I looked and I don't know where you could post your ideas, but you could always ask where to do it on the Help desk. :| TelCo  NaSp   Ve :|   14:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I think I will get there and get my/our suggestion across. It's Me (Speak to me) What have you done? 07:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh also, I just realised that IP editors have to have their changes confirmed on, what, semi-protected pages? I don't know fully. It's Me (Speak to me) What have you done? 12:08, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Advice
1. I see you've been posting your "questions" on a lot of user talkpages lately (Sonia and BrightBlackHeaven, to name a few). Don't post too many of them, though, otherwise you might look like you're Canvassing.

2. I'm not sure if this is intentional or not, but the last part of your sig links to Special:Contributions/Mr_little_Irish (with a capital I), which doesn't exist, but your username is Special:Contributions/Mr_little_irish.




 * Thanks about both, I'll keep my, well, questions to a limit, and I shall change my signature, thanks for noticing that, because I probably wouldn't have. Mr  little  irish  07:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Just checked my sig, and everything is in order with it... so... yea, confused. Mr  little  irish  08:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, well you already changed your sig. I must have been kinda slow that day. What I had previously meant to address was this: What have you done? but it looks like it's all fixed. Anyway, it's only in the sigs you have above this section. I changed one of them as an example. :| TelCo  NaSp   Ve :|   14:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Reply
Yeah, I know the system, and it was a damned mistake that sometimes tends to happen. Usually I create new sections with months and so, but sometimes when creating a new talk page I tend to forget it. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 08:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

User:TeleComNasSprVen
Just in case you didn't get my message. :| TelCo NaSp   Ve :|   14:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Mr little irish/userboxes
Your use of on the top of the page won't work, as it only applies to the one doing the "revising" (i.e. editing) and so since you last edited the page, it only shows your name. But anyway, did you create most of the userboxes yourself? If so, you can post them at Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/New Userboxes. :| TelCo NaSp   Ve :|   14:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I wish I was that awesome to create all of them myself. I don't know if you changed the on the top of the page so I shall check, and if its there, I shall change it. Many thanks for letting me know.  Mr  little  irish  14:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh. One more thing. I'm not sure if we're supposed to do this or that you actually copied REVISIONUSER from someone else, but I'm going to say this just in case. According to Xeno we're supposed to source all the material that we used in our space (see here, when he gave Mono a notice regarding attribution). :| TelCo  NaSp   Ve :|   14:51, 15 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, I don't know, I got it from my talk space template, and I can't remember where I got that from... Mr  little  irish  07:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop
Users are allowed to remove comments and warnings from their own talk pages, as that is an acknowledgement that they have read them (see WP:DRC). Please stop edit-warring them back on with rollback, or it may be removed. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Understood Mr  little  irish  13:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Prince Poppycock
Hello , I think you may have been a bit quick to judge & warn. The text they removed seems to me to be an unsourced BLPvio, added by with  edit. Perhaps you could 'strike' your warning to 118.208.78.180? Regards, 220  of  Borg 11:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Striked from the record Mr  little  irish  21:34, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * for that! I was  a long term IP editor  (2 years +) till recently. We do need to be nice to our newbies!
 * Before being assimilated I too was of Irish Australian, though several generations removed from the County Cork  country.
 * I don't recall seeing  text  before, but  text  works too! You might like  , too.  Merry Christmas!  - 220  of  Borg 01:57, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Om nom nom... Thanks Vrenator! Mr  little  irish  21:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

???
... Rich Farmbrough, 10:14, 12 January 2012 (UTC).


 * I was about to undo my changes, then noticed I got a message, if you have not already undid my undo, I'll do it now. Sorry! I say the -13k characters and assumed a page black of some sort. Mr  little  irish  10:17, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * NP. It's sorted. Rich Farmbrough, 10:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC).

Requests for adminship/MikeLynch
Hello O Irishman, thank you for your views, I appreciate it. I have left a comment just below your !vote, kindly go through it if you wish. (Also what tends to happen is that, over here, the edit count for Jan 2011 is quite large, and it puts all the other edit counts into perspective, so what may be seen as smaller bars, in fact constitute something like 500 edits each on an average). Of course, its your call in the end! Thanks,  Lynch 7  11:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * My problem is you did nearly 5k edits in one month, then this number reduced by a huge amount, and then a second huge amount again. Such a large amount of edits in such a short amount of time seems a bit unreasonable. I understand and respect that you are an Admin and a 'Crat on another wiki, however this is not the same wiki, and difference guidlines and policies are in place here. I trust by your reactions to myself and to others that you accept these terms, and judging by the current support you have in the RfA, if looks like you have a high chance of getting Admin here. I wish you the best of luck, but at this time, cannot support your request. 195.200.159.1 (talk) 13:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * My computer signed me out. Mr  little  irish  13:14, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, that was a period where I used Huggle a lot, hence the high count. No issues, its your opinion, thanks for that.  Lynch 7  13:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

A discussion that may be of interest to you
Hey there, Diminutive Hibernian, Esq., there is a discussion that may interest you at Counter-Vandalism Unit/Re-formatting/Discussion. As one of the hardest working Anti-vandals that I've run into, I'm sure the Project would love to hear your imput. Cheers! Achowat (talk) 15:45, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

MOTDs (This space for rent)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 12:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012 MOTD's award for helping the project in a difficult time
Additional note: Hoping that you feel comfortable with us, we hope and desire that you will want to continue contributing to our/your project. I personally think that if many of us contribute, then about ten minutes per week, by reviewing the existing nominations, and eventually adding new nominations, should be more than enough to get the project going! Once again, thank you from your Motto of the day. –p joe f (talk • contribs) 10:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you re libraries
I updated my computer with new memory and new OS. Windows 7 is working okay but I'm not up to speed on it. So I look at the differences (from XP) sceptically. But I will persist with libraries. Thanks, Wanderer57 (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

CVU Academy
Hello there! Your input is request at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy. You had commented on the re-formatting discussion at WP:CVU but have yet to comment on the progress done to implement a major change discussed during the reformatting discussion, namely the training for new anti-vandals. Any input would be appreciated, thank you. Cheers! Achowat (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:54, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for picking up my strike error, missed that one. Cheers GimliDotNet ( Speak to me,  Stuff I've done )  18:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 11:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Dennis Brown's RfA
Mr little irish, there is nothing to be gained from continuing to press Malleus for information which he is not obligated in any way to give. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:16, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Information as to his !vote being valid is gained information. Malleus had stated that it had been explained elsewhere, but not where his !vote counted. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 15:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * He is not obligated to say anything, and nothing good can come from pressing the point. Just a word of advice. Drmies (talk) 15:28, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Noted, thanks. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 15:39, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Some Spam for you
Nom! I had Spam for breakfast. With egg and mushrooms. In a sandwich Nom! Mr Little Irish (talk) © 15:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

CVUA
My diminutive hibernian friend, I noticed that a second Enrollee has added their name to the list, but not one has contacted hir about being hir instructor. Do you feel comfortable taking on that role? Achowat (talk) 14:58, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I shall do! Thanks for prodding me, just busy 'hard at work' and all that. I will contact said Enrollee now. I assume you are watching my talk so I am not going to spam you with a TB Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 15:02, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Good guess! Do a good job, make us proud. Achowat (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Achowat (talk) 15:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, I saw your note on the Enrollment page (and removed it, just for cleanup). I really want to, at least at first, be able to check in on Dan and Tarheel and make sure they're committed to this and make sure their teaching "right", if you will. But that's just while we're in Beta. I'm sure you can handle more, and your work with Theo seems to be good. Achowat (talk) 13:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I already sent them an invite, but I can pass them on to Dan or Tarheel if they respond. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 13:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, since Dan contributes at night and Tarheel seems to be on a WikiMiniBreak (a MiniWikiBreak?), feel free to take Nightenbelle on, as well. She seems Clueful, but relatively inexperienced. She's perfect for what the CVUA is all about. Achowat (talk) 13:33, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Nightenbelle seems to have a pretty good grasp already, some brilliant reverts contributed by her. I shall add her to my list for now. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 13:42, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Just remember to talk her (and all your students) through all 4 steps. Identifying, restoring, warning, and reporting. Achowat (talk) 13:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed, both my enrollee's seem to have very good knowledge already of what it is ect, so I have advised to continue as they are, and have advised Nightenbelle to maybe apply for Rollback. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 13:49, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm watching your conversations, like a good WikiJaguar. It seems good, if there are any issues, I'll let you know. Achowat (talk) 13:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't have signed up if I didn't know what I was doing. I'm pretty sure you gave me a barnstar at somepoint in the past in regards to my reverts... Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 14:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * And you're doing great, man. Don't take my comments to mean anything else. Achowat (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh God no! I know you WP:AGF :) Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 14:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

CVUA Enrollee!
Hi - thanks so much for reaching out to me, I'd love to be your student. It sounds quite interesting, really.. Just let me know what next my (our, whatever) next steps should be. Thanks so much!  Theopolisme  TALK 20:28, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

WPCVU
Hiya. I would like to enroll. I've been reverting and patrolling for vandalism for about 2 years, but I just sit in CVN and check new pages- if there is a better/more efficient way I would love to learn about it. Nightenbelle (talk) 13:32, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your sign:
There is a problem as when we click on contributions button, this is appearing: Now it is up to you that will you change your preferences or will give me your password so that I can fix it for you?

I hope that you'll do it yourself. Thanks!  Yash  t  101   10:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah yes, spotted it. I will change it now, Just need to amend the link. How come, just out of curiousity, you wish to see my contribs? Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 10:57, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Amended now. Also, I don't think you should be suggesting editors provide their password. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 11:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Obviously you won't give me your password (I was just kidding there).
 * And I wanted to see your contributions because I saw your sign arround for few times and just wanted to see your contributions. To be frank, I wanted to see that you are an admin or not.  Yash  t  101   13:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Nope not an admin. You could have just asked me that :) Did you think I was an amin? Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 14:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * From your words...Yes!  Yash  t  101   14:20, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Recall
Please don't ask RFA candidates if they are open to recall. It is divisive and unhelpful. Hipocrite (talk) 13:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry but it's a valid question in which I would like to know the answer to. I have seen it many times in previous RFA's. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 13:40, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * It is divisive and unhelpful - please review Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Archive_164,, Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_August_17, and Wikipedia_talk:Administrators_open_to_recall/Archive_3. Please reach a consensus on a talk page that the prior consensus, that the question is divisive and unhelpful, is no longer accurate. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I would propose you review those discussions you provided. All ended with no change in the process. If you think Admin Recall is divisive and unhelpful, perhaps you should work to reach a consensus on a talk page. Achowat (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Recall, in and of itself, is not what I refer to. There is a consensus that asking admins if they will be open to recall is divisive and unhelpful. Hipocrite (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * And why I returned - thank you for removing the question, it's appreciated. Hipocrite (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I only removed it because with current procedings ongoing at ANI in regards to yourself, I assumed you could do without more drama. I stand by my statement that it is a valid question. You're more than likely going to oppose anyway. Ther will be something you don't like in that RFA somewhere, there's still six days for it to appear. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 13:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Possible. I appreciate you humoring me, then, if it was only done for my well-being, though I should note that I feel that I have been vindicated by the current proceedings. I doubt there will be something I don't like in that RFA - I don't see why I wouldn't trust the user in question. Hipocrite (talk) 13:55, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * More just 'giving the baby his bottle'. Without meaning to cause offense. I could do without the drama today also. Taking my girl out for a romantic meal and what not, she won't want me banging on about 'pedia all night. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 13:59, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Review
 Yash  t  101   15:11, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have seen your comments, thank you very much for your feedback. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 15:12, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Your RFA
I wish you had shot me a note about writing a nom statement for you before you ran. However, I would have cautioned you against it. Despite being knowledgable and clueful, you're going to get a lot of (misplace, IMO) WP:NOTNOW votes, just because you don't have the thousands of edits RFA generally demands. It's a shame, because if you did get your count up to 5-7,000, you'd have a real shot at it. You do good work, and it's a shame that your RFA (barring any serious-serious changes in heart) will be unsuccessful. You will have my support, however. Achowat (talk) 15:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah, I'm just going for it. I can't remove the subst from the damn thing though. Help??? I hate markup. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 15:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I believe I've got the subst fixed, but now it's making the X!/RfX Report display "closure pending". Achowat (talk) 15:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Too much too soon... If you'd have asked for advise to any established editor either an admin or other or even me. Then they/I could have guided you to the right direction. I appreciate your energy and you are responsible editor also, but there is time for everything and this is not the right time for an RfA about you. Sorry to oppose. Perhaps you could look at this: User:Yasht101/RfA criteria and User:Worm That Turned/Magic Formula  Yash  t  101   16:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, Mr Little Irish. I'm sorry that you've experienced so much opposition at your RfA, but I would strongly advise that you withdraw. You are certainly a good editor - as I said in my neutral rationale, I am certain that you will make a good administrator candidate in the future. However, your lack of experience is a problem (even for those who do not count edits, less than 1000 is simply too few). I recommend that you withdraw and spend the next few months getting experience at Wikipedia and enjoying editing. Continue the good work you do (and it is good work - I do appreciate the useful comments you make at WP:PERM) and try to get some article work under your belt. Best of luck with whatever you decide to do, and please do ask me if you need any advice. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

I will more than likely withdraw but I am going to wait until tomorrow before I do so. Many editors are active overnight, from the US. I'm going to get as much feedback as I can from this experience, then I shall take all of it and use it to better my future within the project. Thank you guys for your wise words already. Mr Little Irish (talk) © 20:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Typos
Thanks for this. -- RA (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Nightenbelle
MLI, ol' buddy ol' chap! It seems as though a passing editor just left a message on Nightenbelle's talk page about inappropriate use of Rollback; seems like as good a time as any to drop in and do a little more work together. Achowat (talk) 20:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 04:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
v/r - TP 12:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
v/r - TP 13:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your RfA was unsuccessful
I have closed your RFA early as it was highly unlikely to succeed and I think you have received all the constructive feedback it was likely to generate. I hope you will not be too disheartened by the unsuccessful outcome and will consider reapplying once you have addressed the issues raised by those who opposed. I know the RFA process can be rather demoralising and trust you will keep in mind the positive comments that were made. Thank you for volunteering your time to help out on Wikipedia. WJBscribe (talk) 22:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * If you don't take that feedback and do good things with it, I'll be on a plane to London next week, and you and I are going to have a serious conversation . You do good work, if you don't keep it up, I'll be using that new flail Dan gave me for more than just Vandals. Achowat (talk) 03:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The only reason I didn't withdraw was to get the feedback that I needed. I'm planning on taking the feedback and using it to make myself a better, more experienced editor. Achowat, you should get on the plane over here anyway, I owe you a beer. Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 09:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

 * Nom! Thank you! Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 14:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I thought it was a fairly positive RfA. When the main comment is "You do great work, you just need to get more experience", I think it is clear that adminship is going to be down the road for Irish.  No one had anything negative to say about you, which is a rarity at an RfA and demonstrates that they all think you have the proper temperament for the mop.  Even though it didn't result in you getting the admin bit, I hope you saw all the positives that came out of it, including the fact that many people respect you, even if they think you need more experience.    Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  14:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I was suprised that there were no hostile comments to be fair, after !voting in alot of recent RFA's I've seen a lot of hostility arise from such events. Hopefully, in 10 to 12 months if I do re-apply, everybody will be in the Support section and I can start to learn to use the tools effectively. Now, on to researching something to create an article on. Most things are already covered! Mr Little Irish  (talk) © 14:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Think about local things around you and you'll surely find something notable  Yash  t  101   14:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on User talk:Jasper Deng/IPv6
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:Jasper Deng/IPv6. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Level Up episodes
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Level Up episodes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pittsburgh Passion
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pittsburgh Passion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Non-administrator observation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Non-administrator observation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 18:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 19:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox film
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox film. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 20:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hydraulic fracturing
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hydraulic fracturing. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 21:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Public image of Mitt Romney
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Public image of Mitt Romney. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Nathan2055talk 22:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 23:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pakistan
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pakistan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 00:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)