User talk:Mramo

Warning about uploading images
Hi, I see you've been uploading images for various Liverpool footballers. While Wikipedia welcomes new images and contributions toward improving articles, it also does not want copyrighted images uploading. There are two reasons for this: For footballers it is rare to find an image on the internet that is fine to upload to wikipedia. The only real way to be sure that the photo you're uploading is good, is to have taken it yourself. Various players do have photos taken by Wikipedians, e.g. Steven Gerrard, and I would encourage you to do the same in future. Cheers, aLii 13:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) It's unlawful.
 * 2) It costs money to have lawyers to defend yourself, when being sued for copyright violation.

Image tagging for Image:Rafabenitez.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rafabenitez.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 15:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:1Rafabenitez.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1Rafabenitez.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:23, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:1rafabenitez.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1rafabenitez.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Pennantj.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pennantj.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ytny 00:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Bellamyc.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bellamyc.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ytny 00:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC) Ytny 00:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Maldinip.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maldinip.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Hammal.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hammal.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 20:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyright status of Image:Besian1.jpg
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Besian1.jpg with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Image:Besian1.jpg with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a tag on the article page and leave a note at  saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. Angelo 12:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyright status of Image:Arbeloa.jpg
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Arbeloa.jpg with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Image:Arbeloa.jpg with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a tag on the article page and leave a note at  saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. .

In short, please stop uploading non-free images claiming they were made by yourself. As you can see, they will be deleted at sight, and we all have no trouble at all in finding out where you took them from. Should you keep acting this way, you might be blocked. Thanks. Angelo 18:20, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Agger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Agger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

A warning
. Please do not make personal attacks, as you did at User talk:86.138.80.9 = seen here at this link - you can be blocked for this. --84.45.219.185 12:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. - as the above anon has stated. Another threat of physical violence like that and I'll block your account myself - A l is o n  ☺ 12:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * You're also uploading a lot of images with incorrect licenses. The above 'agger' one was hardly in the public domain as it was taken over 100 years ago?? - A l is o n  ☺ 12:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

LFC
I did remove those lists, yeah - I agree that the information is useful, but another user had already removed them earlier. What I did was to include all the information in text form above, rather than to simply have a list (Wikipedia policy states that excessive lists are generally to be avoided in articles, and if it's possible to have the information in paragraph form, to do so). I figured that this would be a way of keeping the content in the article without having people constantly removing the list. When you put the list back in, therefore, it was duplicating content that was already in the article in a different form, so I removed it again. If you think the info would be better served being in a list, it might be better to open a discussion on the talk page and see what people think - I meant no offence in removing your content, though, simply that it was a bit superfluous! Seb Patrick 12:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Acs 4b T C U 02:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Notice
Due to your incredibly uncivil edits and your apparent inability to stop uploading copyrighted images under false licenses, you've now been blocked indefinitely. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 19:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC)