User talk:Mrbingley123

Your addition to Paramount Theater (Charlottesville, Virginia)‎ has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Hairhorn (talk) 02:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ash Lawn Opera (June 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zach_Vega&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

Zach Vega ( talk to me ) 01:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Addition of references for the Ash Lawn Opera article
Hi - I've done quite a bit of work to the article and have found a few good references from external sources which support the statements made in it.

However, be aware of the necessary formatting. I've moved your latest inclusion - from c-ville: what is that? an online paper? - and created a full reference. Go in and take a look as to how you should format it in future. We don't add "raw URLS" to articles - i.e. without naming an author (if known) and the name of the site to which the it is linked.

I don't think that the article, while is still a stub, is likely to be moved now that we have enough 3rd-party sources to refer to. If you can find more, please add them, but don't just copy material from them. Short quotations are generally ok - as long as they appear as such and are linked to appropriate refs. Good luck! Viva-Verdi (talk) 21:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC)


 * As a follow up, I've been in touch with Zach Vega and he is comfortable with the way the article reads now, so there is no likelihood of it being removed. Also, I think we can remove the "Stub" tag and call it a "Start", but the more you can find out and add, the better. Viva-Verdi (talk) 13:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)