User talk:Mrblieu2011

Welcome!

Hello, Mrblieu2011, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Paige Bradley, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Paige Bradley


A tag has been placed on Paige Bradley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your interest in Wikipedia and for the article you posted earlier, Paige Bradley. Unfortunately, it appeared to be substantively the same as ; it may not have been copyright infringement in the usual sense since you state that you are working with the artist, but that page does not indicate its copyright status, which defaults to all rights reserved. Wikipedia articles are licensed by WP:CC-BY-SA, a Creative Commons license that allows for redistribution by any third party for pretty much any purpose, including commercial use, without recompense or prior consultation. Please see also Donating copyrighted materials and Requesting copyright permission. If you control the material at that site, the simplest way to release it under a compatible license is simply to put a notice of copyright on the relevant pages. Please be aware, though, that any such release will apply to use and re-use by anyone and everyone, not just Wikipedia; moreover, the article here will be edited and will in time come to no longer reflect the original text. There is a secondary concern, in that articles here need to focus on summarizing how topics have been treated in independent reliable sources, such as newspapers, trade publications, and books from respected publishing houses, and should not be unduly self-promoting. Please see Your first article for some more helpful advice on getting into the swing of encyclopedia writing. I can provide a copy of the deleted article so you do not lose the work you have already invested, if you would like. If you have any questions or I may help with anything, please do not hesitate to swing by my talkpage. Happy editing, - 2/0 (cont.) 00:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Paige Bradley creating a patina on bronze sculpture.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paige Bradley creating a patina on bronze sculpture.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Expansion Sculpture by Paige Bradley.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Expansion Sculpture by Paige Bradley.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Are you Elizabeth Barlow?
You have uploaded several paintings by Elizabeth Barlow which you claimed are your own work. If you are Elizabeth Barlow, you need to be aware of Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest. If you are not Elizabeth Barlow, you need permission from her as the copyright holder to upload these images. Uploading images to Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons requires them to be released under a free licence. Un assiolo (talk) 00:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I am Elizabeth's content manager and work directly for her which includes creating her Wikipedia content. Mrblieu2011 (talk) 00:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * In that case you should read Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest to see how to properly disclose your conflict of interest. When uploading the images, I believe you were given the option to say this is someone else's work and you instead said this was your own work. Your best option now is probably to delete the images and re-upload them with the correct data. I can assist in deleting the images if you want. --Un assiolo (talk) 00:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello Mrblieu2011. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Paige Bradley, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mrblieu2011. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DanCherek (talk) 04:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello Dan - I do assist Paige Bradley with updates, but not in a paid capacity. Thank you for checking. Mrblieu2011 (talk) 18:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)