User talk:Mrblondnyc

From a ***** who refuses to follow the rules
I did not vandalize anything, you need to read the notes, before making assumtions, {Someone copied the filmography section I CREATED on the main page and put just that filmography on a seperate page, then linked it back to the main page, making it redundant information because, the only stuff on the seperate page was the exact same as on the main page, which was just plain stupid and was just wasting space}. If you read the notes you will see that.Rogue Gremlin 03:25, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

No thanks, Cause I take it you didn't read the notesRogue Gremlin 02:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

There was a note there asking for an admin to remove, for the reasons i had stated, just because you fail to be able to comprehend anything is not my fault. So Please do this ***** a favor and DO NOT respond Rogue Gremlin 03:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I asked you nicely to please do not respond. Please quit STALKING me. Does wiki have a policy on stalkers like you?Rogue Gremlin 01:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Don Rickles
Will you take a look at the Talk:Don Rickles page, and under "Los Angeles or Florida" tell me what you think? Thanks.

August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 12:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart received heavy editing today by unregistered users and may benefit from a good review. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee  (Talk) 07:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

What citation is needed in Paul Mooney article?
This is a stand-up comedy, how can citation be made?

BlackAsker 21:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Heber
Someone alerted me to a free version of the California index - it can be searched at http://www.familytreelegends.com/records/39461. I added a citation from that to Heber's article. Hope that helps. Cheers, Mad Jack 21:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Quotectomy
I appreciate your bold edit to History of Family Guy. Just so you know, WP:FGjokebook is something I dreamed up one night. While it's reasonably consistent with WP:NOT, there has not been a consensus review of any sort, so I wouldn't yet call it a "guideline", even within WP:FG purposes.

I'd call a convention of the WP:FG editors to see if we can establish a consensus, but current participation is very low, and the active editors tend to object to guidelines that exclude anything.

If interested, you'd certainly be welcome to sign up. / edg ☺ ★ 21:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call
Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add   to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well. Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing! An automatic notification by BrownBot 00:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:OriginalGeorgeCarlinLP.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:OriginalGeorgeCarlinLP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thebabe.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Thebabe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Let's-Do-It-Again-Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Let's-Do-It-Again-Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter
The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

New York City Meetup
The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of a Wikimedia New York City local chapter. Hope to see you there! --Pharos 20:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:75akaufman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:75akaufman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Greetingsposter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Greetingsposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MorkMindy.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:MorkMindy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Streetsurvivorsorig.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Streetsurvivorsorig.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Indie holofcener.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Indie holofcener.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Category:Television programs based on plays
Hi, Could you be careful with this category - you seem to be adding it to films. Thanks, -- Beloved Freak  21:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, my apologies then. I have a different understanding of the word, but as you created the category, I'll let you define it. I reverted a few of your additions by the way, so sorry about that. However, The Laramie Project (film) doesn't seem to be defined as a television film either on it's article or by imdb.-- Beloved Freak  22:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, didn't notice it was in "American television films"; thanks for clearing that up! -- Beloved Freak  22:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eq01a katia.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eq01a katia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arthur (1981 film) poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Arthur (1981 film) poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MurphysRomance2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MurphysRomance2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NEW-dvd-1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NEW-dvd-1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Monumentave.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Monumentave.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

You're invited!
...to the next New York City Meetup!

In the morning, there are exciting plans for a behind-the-scenes guided tour of the American Museum of Natural History.

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues (see the last meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pp video.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pp video.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Oddcouple.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Oddcouple.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 04:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Razor84.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Razor84.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Robin.mork.pam.mindy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Robin.mork.pam.mindy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sunset Boulevard (2008 film)
An editor has nominated Sunset Boulevard (2008 film), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Guest stars on The Wire
I notice you've made a few alterations to the guest star lists for recent The Wire episodes. Could I ask if you have a source for any of your changes? I'm confused as you stated on Not for Attribution that Vincent M. Ward played the pastor but then changed this back to show that he played Butchie's bodyguard. What changed your mind? Also on React Quotes you changed John Badila to a newspaperman. Was there a source for this? I thought from looking at a photo of Badila on google images that he was the desk sergeant but this is just guess work on my part.--Opark 77 (talk) 14:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Also I note that you added an M. initial to Scott Templeton and Alma Gutierrez - what was the source for this?--Opark 77 (talk) 14:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. I re-googled those actors before posting here and definitely agree that you are right (on the desk sergeant). You are right that I am working from guesses and google. I hoped you ahd a more concrete method I could adopt! Isn't Sophia Wang Sonja Sohn's daughter? I think that was my thinking on that one, I came across a report of her being in the episode in a sweet scene and made the assumption on that.--Opark 77 (talk) 18:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * LOL. You certainly proved I needed one with Bobby J. Brown! That would be great.--Opark 77 (talk) 19:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lar_larabee.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lar_larabee.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Theoddcouple.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Theoddcouple.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Water .jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Water .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Walkingtalking.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Walkingtalking.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:20051006 106 350x263.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:20051006 106 350x263.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carney2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Carney2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fernwood09.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Fernwood09.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kwamepolkadots .jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kwamepolkadots .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Happydays02.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Happydays02.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MorkMindy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MorkMindy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Raylene Lee
Hey MrBlondNYC. I got the surname for Raylene Lee from the H file closeups in The Dickensian Aspect. She is down as a Lee on there. I was particularly proud of getting Bug's name - Aaron Manigault - as it is only in focus as the Bunk turns the page. Kind of sad really :( --Opark 77 (talk) 12:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Jamal
Hey, you recently added an appearance in "Unto Others" for Jamal - I don't recall seeing him past the third season. Where did he pop up in that episode?--Opark 77 (talk) 16:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

New mailing list
There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it!  Cbrown1023   talk   21:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

You are invited!
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

You're also invited to subscribe to the public Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates. This has been an automated delivery because you were on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 03:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oc2.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Oc2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Season 4 credits
Noticed you made some edits to "Soft Eyes" today, if you do get a chance to check the credits from the article against the credits from the episode could you put them in number order? I mean change the bullets (*) to numbers (#). It is the first 2 that I haven't been able to do.--Opark 77 (talk) 10:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

John Leguizamo
You want to talk facts, then we will talk facts. This has nothing to do about my heritage pride. The fact is that there are many reliable verifiable sources out there which state that his father is Puerto Rican, among them the "New York Times" in the following article: A Mambo King Speaks Words of Comedy; By GLENN COLLINS; Published: January 23, 1991. But, hold it, believe it or not I'm going with you on this one. Leguizamo does state in his bio. that his dad is 1/2 Puerto Rican. Here is a funny thing, I found a site that states that his mother is 1/2 P.R., so you go figure. So, I guess we're cool, right? Tony the Marine (talk) 05:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm with you. We're good. Tony the Marine (talk) 05:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1/4 Puerto Rican, 1/4 Italian and 1/2 Colombian? Sounds like he had two dads and one mom then. If you keep tracking back into people's ancestries by percentage I would be 1/3 African, 1/5 Taino, 1/7 Spanish, and not Puerto Rican at all. No one would be 100% anything either. ~RayLast  «Talk! » 13:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You obviously didn't get what I said, which has nothing to do with math. Nice brain work genius. ~RayLast  «Talk! » 03:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Not to make this an issue, since Leguizamo does state in his bio that he is 1/4 this, 1/4 that and so on. To a certain point I understand that said information is posted with a reliable source as required by Wiki policy (I myself, saw the entery in his bio). But, what I ask myself is "Why even bother posting that in the article"? I can understand some people being curious as to the parents of the subject, but who cares from where a subjects grandparents, great-grandparents and so on came from? What is the point? What does this information add to the encyclopedic nature of the article? Tony the Marine (talk) 21:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

The Super Fight
Per the cover and the official site, the imdb seems to be on error and this should be all one word, superfight. Is it possible you could move it to the correct title, or could I request such a move with your consent? 86.44.28.245 (talk) 04:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I see you say it was originally released under this title, never mind then. 86.44.28.245 (talk) 04:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Bringing Out The Dead
Hello, I believe that you posted a tone tag to the Bringing Out The Dead article...   If so, would you mind checking my attempt to clean it up. Thanks. BubbaStrangelove (talk) 14:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I can't figure out where the tag came from, but thanks for taking a look... and for the seal of approval! BubbaStrangelove (talk) 08:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

NYC Meetup: June 1, 2008
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, elect a board of directors, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wiki Week bonanza, being planned with Columbia University students for September or October.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

Also, check out our regional US Wikimedia chapters blog Wiki Northeast (and we're open to guest posts). This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Ethnicity cats
You asked on the wrong page. You should go to Wikipedia talk:Categorization of people. SamEV (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Bluecollarposter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bluecollarposter.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

help me!!!
Dear Mrblondnyc,

You don't know me, but my name is Soccer5525 and I'm a fellow wikipedian of yours that neds your help. I saw on your userpage that you have many userboxes. I've always wanted to add userboxes to my wikipedia page, but never knew how to! I was wondering if you could help me. Perhaps you could give me step by step directions of how to do it. It would really help! PLEASE! Thanks!

Soccer5525 15:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)--Soccer5525 15:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Soccer5525

== THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!!! ==

Dear Mrblondnyc,

Thank you for telling me about the userboxes! It helped me a lot! Please check out my userpage and see! Aren't they great! Thanks again!

-Soccer5525

NY accent
I just deleted FDR from the list. I wouldn't be hurt, if in your wisdom, you reinsert. Cheers, Bellagio99 (talk) 19:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

acted too fast
Defer to your expertise, even though I don't "hear" it in his voice. Sorry to be so rushed, but (a) I was trying to save the article/section, while (b) trying NOT to get diverted from my own real world deadline;-) Bellagio99 (talk) 20:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

This User's Abuse of other Users
This user sent me a vicious and inappropriate message alleging vandalism. This user doesn't know what he is talking about. Just because he is a Howard Stern fanboy doesn't mean he is protecting the integrity of the encyclopedia by eliminating corrections to the Stern Show page which accurately reflect that the program is not reality, but a scripted performance. His edits are inappropriate and his messages to other users are inappropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.130.202 (talk) 10:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

This is Not a Fan Magazine
This person seems devoted to turning the Howard Stern Show entry into a fan magazine entry. The program itself is replete with references to "writers" and "writers' meetings." I find the efforts of this "contributor" to be more in keeping with a public relations campaign than with development of responsible encyclopedia articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.130.202 (talk) 11:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Second Annual WikiNYC Picnic
Greetings! You are invited to attend the second annual New York picnic on August 24! This year, it will be taking place in the Long Meadow of Prospect Park in Brooklyn. If you plan on coming, please sign up and be sure to bring something! Please be sure to come! You have received this automated delivery because your name was on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 20:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

The Godfather and The Godfather Part II deleted scenes
This article, which you contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Please go here if you're interested in participating in the discussion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz)  (talk / cont)  23:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikis Take Manhattan
WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City. The event is based on last year's Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, and has evolved to include StreetsWiki this year as well.

LAST YEAR'S EVENT


 * Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Spring 2008 (a description of the results, and the uploading party)
 * Commons:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Gallery (our cool gallery)

WINNINGS? Prizes include a dinner for three with Wikipedia creator Jimmy Wales at Pure Food & Wine, gift certificates to Bicycle Habitiat and the LimeWire Store, and more!

WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, September 27th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.

WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!

REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.

WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's West Village office. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:


 * Wikis Take Manhattan page at The Open Planning Project


 * 349 W. 12th St. #3
 * Between Greenwich & Washington Streets
 * By the 14th St./8th Ave. ACE/L stop

FOR UPDATES

Check out:


 * Wikis Take Manhattan main website

This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.

Thanks,
 * Pharos

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:99 probs.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:99 probs.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:99problemsvideo.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:99problemsvideo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Fictional Puerto Rican-Americans
Category:Fictional Puerto Rican-Americans, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

hey can ytou helep me

 * Hey, ehlep me you can with the finding of a source to prove that Sidney Kimmel and Jimmy Kimmels relationsio if you have any time??? Smith Jones (talk) 23:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

NYC Meetup: You are invited!
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, finalize and approve bylaws, interact with representatives from the Software Freedom Law Center, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the June meeting's minutes and the September meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikis Take Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wikipedia Loves Art! bonanza, being planned with the Brooklyn Museum for February.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * thaks for your help. i didnt know whether or not that jimmmy kimmel was related to sidney kimmel. kimmel to me is an uncomon last name so it wasnt sure if it was a concidence or if they were related and i wasnt looking for the source in the right place. thanks for your help and thanks for checking for my mistakes. Smith Jones (talk) 12:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

honky comment
Will you please consider removing your comment in the Honky talk page? It is not appropriate in that context. I do not need any "hate messages" in return, but before someone removes it or reports you for vandalism, you are being given fair warning. If you need to reply, please do so here (I will return to your page in case you do) or reply to my comment left on the talk page under your (and others) comments if needed. Thank you, have a good day. re: [edit] NPOV Edit. 2legit2quit2 (talk) 06:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Questionnaire
As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).

We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:31, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

NYC Meetup: You're invited!
Join us the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around Wikipedia Loves Art! museum photography events at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum.

There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing Wikimedia New York City issues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Himomposter.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Himomposter.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Switch .jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Switch .jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

The Godfather
My mistake. Thanks for the correction! --Hnsampat (talk) 01:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Black rock musicians
There is a CfD discussion about Category:Black rock musicians that you might be interested in. — Loadmaster (talk) 22:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Hip hop WikiProject Roll Call
Hello, fellow Hip Hop WikiProject members!

This message is being sent out to let all listed members of the project know to re-add your name to the members list, as all current names on the list have been erased in order to find out who is still active on the project. WikiGuy86 (talk) 14:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Stephen Colbert GAR
Stephen Colbert has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:47, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Arnold Stang, the New Yorker
I was going to replace the UK newspaper cite with the NY Times obit, ut ran out of time to do so before I had to fly. Glad you found something.Bellagio99 (talk) 00:53, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Frank White (fictional character)


The article Frank White (fictional character) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, not notable independent of the film, which has its own page at King of New York.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bdb484 (talk) 18:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

WTH?
What the hell are you talking about?

71.135.38.83 (talk) 07:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Black and white television programs
I have nominated black and white television programs for renaming to black-and-white television programs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:14, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Untitled works
I have nominated untitled works for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Stephen Colbert
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to note my appreciation for being one of the people that helped to raise the quality of the Stephen Colbert article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Percy Rodriguez.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Percy Rodriguez.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 20:59, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

AfD proposal on "Koton"
Hi Mrblondnyc, you proposded Koton for deletion, I've responded on the talk page, just wanted to let you know. Feel free to delete this comment once you've responded. Ta, -m -i -k -e -y - Talk / C 12:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited Hit Squad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:42, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Hit Squad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hit Squad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hit Squad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:00, 18 April 2012 (UTC)


 * My Keep was reluctant because, in my judgment, the Hit Squad article is doomed to be a perpetual stub, a footnote in the history of rap/hip-hop music. As an entity, the Hit Squad didn't have a distinct and memorable identity, logo or style.  It was a loose conglomeration of talent that performed together for a few years, broke up, and then got back together for a reunion performance.  Occasional reunions may recur in the future but I don't think there will ever be a substantial Hit Squad Wikipedia article.  I prefer substantial articles that can continue to grow and mature but there's a place in Wikipedia for smaller articles, those "footnotes," when the subject is notable enough to meet Wikipedia standards.  Hit Squad did so. Take care, DocTree (talk) 01:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Vásquez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Rican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gerald Brisco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Patterson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Top Five, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DMX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Reporting an editor
Thanks for your message on my talk page. I think you were referring to "ClassicOnAStick". I see you and that user edit a lot of the same wrestling articles. I didn't report that editor. They are definitely not a vandal, just one of those Wikipedia outliers who frustrate people but overall make positive edits. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:05, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

A gentle survey for research purpose
Hello Mrblondnyc,

I am Bowen Yu, a computer science PhD student at the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities. Currently, we are working on a project studying the main article and sub article relationship in a purpose of better serving the Wikipedia article structure. It would be appreciated if you could take 4-5 minutes to finish the survey questions. Thanks in advance! We will not collect any of your personally information.

Thank you for your time to participate this survey. Your response is important for us!

https://umn.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_bvm2A1lvzYfJN9H

Non-free use of File:MorkMindy.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:MorkMindy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the di-fails NFCC tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Please avoid changing "Trump" to "Drumpf"
Hi Mrblondnyc. In one of your recent edits, you changed the word "Trump" to "Drumpf". I assume that this was unintentional and caused by having the Drumpfinator extension enabled. To avoid this kind of mistake in the future, please disable the extension before editing articles that mention Trump. Thank you. —Granger (talk · contribs) 21:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mrs. Eastwood & Company


The article Mrs. Eastwood & Company has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Sourced entirely to press releases"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Underground (TV series)


The article The Underground (TV series) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2021"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  22:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)