User talk:Mrbluebob

October 2012
Hello, I'm Cresix. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Don Bluth, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 19:19, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to All Dogs Go to Heaven 2. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 19:20, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Mrbluebob. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Danielj2705 (talk) 19:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Kelly Macdonald. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 21:23, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Kelly Macdonald, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Cresix (talk) 21:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Alyssa Milano, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 21:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

YouTube links
STOP adding YouTube links. It is a copyright violation and violates Wikipedia policy. You are being very disruptive, and if you continue to vandalize and ignore warnings, you will be blocked from editing. Cresix (talk) 22:01, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Mrbluebob, you are invited to the Teahouse
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Duct tape. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please stop your edit warring over gags and duct tape, across several articles. '' Binksternet (talk) 16:00, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. You have repeatedly added and changed content in articles, adding irrelevant information and POV comments, despite many editors reverting you and explaining why the edits were not acceptable. Instead of discussing the concerns raised you simply reverted time and time again. I suspect that this is all for lulz, but in case you are serious and would like to contribute to Wikipedia in a collaborative fashion, please ensure that when your block expires you discuss contentious changes on the article talk pages if your edits are reverted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)