User talk:Mrboondocks

Welcome!
  Hello, Mrboondocks!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.187.39.133.201 (talk) 00:34, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Eastern Europe and the Balkans sanctions alert
—Jéské Couriano v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 05:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

 * how you assumed I am a sockpuppet ? Mrboondocks (talk) 07:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * Why would an admin discuss anything with a sockpuppet of a persona non grata whose modus operandi makes any such discussion a waste of time and effort? —Jéské Couriano  v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 07:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC) I cannot directly reply directly to you, i am replying here. How come my modus operandi makes such discussion waste of time ? I infact added a credible edit in talk sections. Also such blocks discourages new users to come and edit at wiki, Every editor is new at some point. Regardless where I edited I did infact supported by arguments with credible sources. And how you assumed I am a sock pupet of anyone else ? you can check my IP or something to verify it cant you Mrboondocks (talk) 07:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I cannot directly reply directly to you, i am replying here. How come my modus operandi makes such discussion waste of time ? I infact added a credible edit in talk sections. Also such blocks discourages new users to come and edit at wiki, Every editor is new at some point. Regardless where I edited I did infact supported by arguments with credible sources. And how you assumed I am a sock pupet of anyone else ? you can check my IP or something to verify it cant you ?Mrboondocks (talk) 07:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC) /


 * @Jéské Couriano Mrboondocks (talk) 07:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You deliberately produced an edit into the topic area globally banned user was involved in to make a point or to prompt someone to file SPI that would most likely show no relation to the banned user (proxy use). You are ether Icewhiz, Miacek or one of other Icewhiz's associates. Obvious sock puppet, not a new user. - GizzyCatBella  🍁  08:13, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * you have any proof of that apart from your assumptions ? you are making an accusation you should provide proof Mrboondocks (talk) 09:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Please direct your attention to WP:DUCK for a few minutes again. - GizzyCatBella  🍁  15:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * So wiki admins relies on duck test and flag new editors as socks, never new this policy.  Mrboondocks (talk) 03:08, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You mean like how @Philip cross account is allowed here who doesnt even take christmas holidays ? Mrboondocks (talk) 03:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 03:41, 17 August 2022 (UTC)