User talk:Mrbutter/Archive/2010

Speedy deletion nomination of ECompete-Online
A tag has been placed on ECompete-Online requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ecompete-online
A tag has been placed on Ecompete-online requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 06:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ECompete-Online


The article ECompete-Online has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. The references are all either blogs or the site itself. Fails WP:N, WP:RS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of ECompete-Online
I have nominated ECompete-Online, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/ECompete-Online. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andy (talk) 22:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Eco-logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:Eco-logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 07:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eco-logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Eco-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:32, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (March)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  13:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (April)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  20:26, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (May)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  18:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (June)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  18:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (July)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  22:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (August)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  14:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (September)
-- Midgrid  (talk)  18:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (October)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  18:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (November)
-- Midgrid  (talk)  23:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (December)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  17:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)