User talk:Mrc fem

March 2010
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Namita Shetty, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  essay  // 10:17, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

May i please knw what is inappropriate about this page. She is a beauty queen and model in india .. why cant she have a page for her. .?? Please check on search if you wish to... And how can you put it under the blatant misinformation category.. did u even once check before doing so if the information was correct??

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Mrc fem! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Namita Shetty -

Speedy deletion nomination of Namita Shetty


A tag has been placed on Namita Shetty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sitush (talk) 20:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I am not sure how to go about with this, but I dont understand what is the sudden need to create a speedy deletion? I was sent a message that you needed references and therefore added pretty valid ones. Namita continues to be a part of the media through her contributions to Missosology that is the world's no.1 pageant website, you could check for yourself. You can google Namita Shetty and you'll find a lot of references to her part in beauty pageants. I am a big fan of hers and I think this is humiliating to her. When I first created this page also someone tag it as an unreal person. I mean what is the level of research that you guys do before putting such ugly warnings on the page? Until last night when I added about her current arena of work, you guys were fine with the article, now suddenly because she is not just a thriving model, you do not want to keep her page?