User talk:Mrdanishequbal

Welcome!
Hello, Mrdanishequbal, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Mrdanishequbal/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mrdanishequbal/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Mrdanishequbal/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mrdanishequbal/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Mrdanishequbal/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

Thank you for your response and for pointing out the concerns regarding a potential conflict of interest. I sincerely apologize for not addressing this earlier and appreciate the opportunity to clarify my position.

I understand the importance of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies and assure you that my intention is to contribute factually accurate and neutral content to the encyclopedia. I recognize that as someone with knowledge of Danish Equbal's work, I must be especially careful to adhere strictly to neutrality and verifiability in my contributions.

Here are the steps I propose to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's standards:

Full Disclosure: I will fully disclose any potential conflict of interest in the relevant discussion pages to ensure transparency with the Wikipedia community. Seeking Consensus: I will actively seek feedback from other editors to ensure the content is balanced and free from bias, and I will make edits based on the community's feedback. Third-party Sources: I commit to using only reliable, independent third-party sources to verify the content and will ensure all claims are supported by these sources, not by my personal knowledge or experiences. I understand the reasons for the decline of my unblock request and respect the community's standards and policies. I am committed to learning from this experience and hope to contribute positively under the guidance and oversight of more experienced editors.

Thank you for considering this response. I am open to further guidance on how I can align my contributions with Wikipedia's values and standards.

June 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Amortias (T)(C) 16:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

Thank you for your response and for pointing out the concerns regarding a potential conflict of interest. I sincerely apologize for not addressing this earlier and appreciate the opportunity to clarify my position.

I understand the importance of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies and assure you that my intention is to contribute factually accurate and neutral content to the encyclopedia. I recognize that as someone with knowledge of Danish Equbal's work, I must be especially careful to adhere strictly to neutrality and verifiability in my contributions.

Here are the steps I propose to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's standards:

Full Disclosure: I will fully disclose any potential conflict of interest in the relevant discussion pages to ensure transparency with the Wikipedia community. Seeking Consensus: I will actively seek feedback from other editors to ensure the content is balanced and free from bias, and I will make edits based on the community's feedback. Third-party Sources: I commit to using only reliable, independent third-party sources to verify the content and will ensure all claims are supported by these sources, not by my personal knowledge or experiences. I understand the reasons for the decline of my unblock request and respect the community's standards and policies. I am committed to learning from this experience and hope to contribute positively under the guidance and oversight of more experienced editors.

Thank you for considering this response. I am open to further guidance on how I can align my contributions with Wikipedia's values and standards.