User talk:Mrdazpa

Deletion discussion about Ashcroft 890
Hello, Mrdazpa, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/Ashcroft 890 whether the article Ashcroft 890 should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Ashcroft 890, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! —> εϻαd ιν  ΤαΙk Ͼδητrιβμτιoης 07:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashcroft 890


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ashcroft 890, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 08:08, 24 November 2011 (UTC)