User talk:Mrel1234

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Mrel1234! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 02:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jackson Ellis-Leach -

Proposed deletion of Jackson Ellis-Leach


The article Jackson Ellis-Leach has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I find no supporting sources on GNews or GBooks, it seems unlikely that the significant impact required for WP:MUSICBIO or WP:NACTOR will be demonstrable. Child supporting actors who do not go on to have a significant acting career are rarely encyclopaedic-ally notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fæ (talk) 11:42, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Jackson Ellis-Leach for deletion
The article Jackson Ellis-Leach is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jackson Ellis-Leach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fæ (talk) 17:51, 31 January 2011 (UTC)