User talk:Mreza v

Shatt al-Arab
Hi Mreza v. Regarding your edits to Shatt al-Arab & Arvand, please do not make such controvertial page moves without seeking consensus first. The issue of that article's name has been discussed at lenght (cf. Talk:Shatt al-Arab & Archive 1), and consensus was reached that in accordance to our current naming conventions the proper title for the article is Shatt al-Arab.

In any case, if you want to move a page (be it this one or any other), please don't do it by copying the contents of a page and pasting it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming articles is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen.

Best regards, Ev (talk) 19:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Switched capacitor filter
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Switched capacitor filter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a manual nor is it a how-to.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MuZemike 18:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Switched capacitor filter
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Switched capacitor filter, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Switched capacitor filter appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Switched capacitor filter has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Switched capacitor filter and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Switched capacitor filter with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Switched capacitor filter.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words; but note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a how-to manual or textbook. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 19:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Judy gorman
A tag has been placed on Judy gorman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheLetterM (talk) 14:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Judy gorman
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Judy gorman, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Judy gorman appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Judy gorman has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Judy gorman and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Judy gorman with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Judy gorman.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 15:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Copyright
Please stop adding material copied from other places. Wikipedia cannot accept copyright material. At the bottom of every edit screen it says, in bold type: "Do not copy text from other websites without a GFDL-compatible license. It will be deleted." If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 15:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)