User talk:Mrhistoryman

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. McGeddon (talk) 19:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

You claim that the copyright statement on Keep Calm and Carry On is "incorrect and untrue". Please go to talk talk:Keep Calm and Carry On and explain why, citing some supporting reference. If you're correct, then it will no doubt be corrected. Continuing to delete a paragraph you disagree with without further discussion is simply vandalism: it will be reverted, you will be blocked. Andy Dingley (talk)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Curious
What are you claiming here? That government artwork more than fifty years old isn't in the public domain, or that the poster wasn't produced by the 1940s government after all? If you give us an explanation of your argument, we'll make sure that this is looked into - blanking the paragraph as "incorrect" will just get you blocked from Wikipedia, and we'll have to wait for someone else to come along and notice the same problem. --McGeddon (talk) 10:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Given that you've just blanked it again, it's very hard to believe you have a serious argument to make, here. If you know something we don't, please take a moment to explain it in clearer terms than "this is incorrect and untrue". --McGeddon (talk) 14:42, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. -- Ged UK  10:53, 4 April 2009 (UTC)