User talk:Mrichardsont/sandbox

Gabriela's Peer Review
1. Lead section The lead section that is easy to understand and does a good job in summarizing the overall meaning of the article. The lead is the first section of an article. It states the most important information about the article such as the meaning of ice shove and all the different names it goes by. This is important information for the reader to know some background on the topic and also mentions the three sections of the article (temperature changes, wind, and changing water levels). There is nothing missing. 2. A clear structure. There are three different aspects of the article and each have their own section. The difference between sections is easy to understand, and each statement has a clear distinction. Each part is organized well and in an order that is easy to follow. 3. Balanced coverage. All sections in the article are necessary for a good understanding and there are good explanations where more explanation is needed. All sections are on-topic. There is no apparent bias in the article. Howeever, there ar more citations for the first source than the second source. It does a good job in showing how well-documented viewpoints should get more space. 4. Neutral content. It has a neutral point of view. It does not persuade the reader into accepting a particular idea or position and has a multitude of information. You can not tell the author's point of view from the article. It does not contain phrases that may be misleading to the reader such as "best" or "most". It is filled with facts and is a clear reflection of various aspects of the topic. 5. Reliable sources. Statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such reviewed papers. All statements in article that appear to need a citation are cited. However, must remove month and day from sources.

Gabrielaperez544 (talk) 14:53, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Gabriela Perez